We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tenants in Common - Executors dealing with sale of property.
Options
Comments
-
Zuffy said:Thank you for sharing your experience of selling your late mums house. Would I be right in assuming from what you say that you received your share of the estate from the solicitor who carried out the conveyancing rather than the buyers solicitor .I would be interested to know as I have been told that the buyers solicitor would be responsible for distributing the funds to the relevant estates.0
-
Thank you very much for your explanation msb1234. Please accept my apologies for my late response but I have been away and I didn’t have any internet access, so only picked up your reply on my return today.0
-
msb1234 said:Zuffy said:Thank you for sharing your experience of selling your late mums house. Would I be right in assuming from what you say that you received your share of the estate from the solicitor who carried out the conveyancing rather than the buyers solicitor .I would be interested to know as I have been told that the buyers solicitor would be responsible for distributing the funds to the relevant estates.0
-
Hi Bossyboots
There are two executors one for Mr A and one for Mrs B .The executor for Mrs B is also the conveyancer dealing with the sale.Would I be right in assuming that it will be the executor/ conveyancer for Mrs B who will receive the funds following the sale of the property.0 -
Zuffy said:Hi Bossyboots
There are two executors one for Mr A and one for Mrs B .The executor for Mrs B is also the conveyancer dealing with the sale.Would I be right in assuming that it will be the executor/ conveyancer for Mrs B who will receive the funds following the sale of the property.0 -
Thank you Bossyboots
I have been on Conveyancing Forums where the advice given is that the buyers conveyancers are responsible for ensuring funds are paid to the relevant estates (in cases of tenants in common where there are two separate estates).It all very confusing especially when conveyancers don’t seem to be following the same rules and processes.0 -
Have a look at "overreaching". Mrs Bs executor will need to appoint a trustee to overreach the part A restriction - and the sale can proceed without any involvement from Mr As executos. It is the responsibility of the seller and that trustee to ensure funds are distributed correctly to the beneficial owners. I wouldn't worry about contacting the buyers solicitor - they will be aware of the part A restriction and so long as there are two sellers named (Mrs Bs executor and the trustee) they won't be bothered by who the beneficial owners are. It would however be worth your while informing Mrs Bs executor of the beneficial ownership along with appropriate documentation - will & grant of probate. It may be worth getting a solicitor to do that.0
-
Thank you Mattojgb.It appears that is exactly what is happening in this case.Mrs B executor has appointed a second trustee and the sale of the property is likely to be completed very soon .
‘Mrs B’s executor has a copy of Mr A’s Will and grant of probate. Thank you for explaining the process.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards