We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Variation on the Bucket Strategy
Options
Comments
-
Your approach is very different from a traditional bucket strategy as it isn't concentrating on growth in what you are considering the long term 3rd bucket. The size of your portfolio relative to your income needs means that you can probably get away with such a conservative approach, but it would not be a good approach for anyone who needed a higher income percentage. Avoiding too much risk can itself be risky as over the long term a low growth portfolio can be eaten away by inflation and bond markets have their own risks as we all experienced when interest rates spiked under Liz Truss.And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.0
-
With a £1.5 million portfolio and £42,000 needed (£50,000 gross) per annum I would go 100% global equities to be honest - perhaps 33.33% VWRL, 33.33% FTWG and 33.33% HMWO to spread provider risk.0
-
FIREDreamer said:With a £1.5 million portfolio and £42,000 needed (£50,000 gross) per annum I would go 100% global equities to be honest - perhaps 33.33% VWRL, 33.33% FTWG and 33.33% HMWO to spread provider risk.And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.0
-
FIREDreamer said:With a £1.5 million portfolio and £42,000 needed (£50,000 gross) per annum I would go 100% global equities to be honest - perhaps 33.33% VWRL, 33.33% FTWG and 33.33% HMWO to spread provider risk.
0 -
IamWood said:FIREDreamer said:With a £1.5 million portfolio and £42,000 needed (£50,000 gross) per annum I would go 100% global equities to be honest - perhaps 33.33% VWRL, 33.33% FTWG and 33.33% HMWO to spread provider risk.
“ … only around £1 million”
😂😂😂😂😂0 -
Bostonerimus1 said:FIREDreamer said:With a £1.5 million portfolio and £42,000 needed (£50,000 gross) per annum I would go 100% global equities to be honest - perhaps 33.33% VWRL, 33.33% FTWG and 33.33% HMWO to spread provider risk.
Hence 20% in each of VWRL, FTWG, HMWO, VHYL and HDLG - dividend yield about 2% overall.0 -
The OP has a lot of leeway so a wide range of asset allocations and withdrawal strategies will work to provide sufficient income. If they add a requirement to leave a certain level of legacy then the options might narrow.And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.0
-
IamWood said:FIREDreamer said:With a £1.5 million portfolio and £42,000 needed (£50,000 gross) per annum I would go 100% global equities to be honest - perhaps 33.33% VWRL, 33.33% FTWG and 33.33% HMWO to spread provider risk.And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.0
-
Bostonerimus1 said:IamWood said:FIREDreamer said:With a £1.5 million portfolio and £42,000 needed (£50,000 gross) per annum I would go 100% global equities to be honest - perhaps 33.33% VWRL, 33.33% FTWG and 33.33% HMWO to spread provider risk.0
-
FIREDreamer said:Bostonerimus1 said:IamWood said:FIREDreamer said:With a £1.5 million portfolio and £42,000 needed (£50,000 gross) per annum I would go 100% global equities to be honest - perhaps 33.33% VWRL, 33.33% FTWG and 33.33% HMWO to spread provider risk.And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards