We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
UKPC Not parked correctly within the markings of the bay or space.
Options
Comments
-
Le_Kirk said:All paragraphs require a number; not sure I would be saying "unable to effectively provide a defence" anyway pictures come later with evidence; surely your case is that you were there for less than the consideration period. You read the signs, didn't like the terms and left! You will of course be slotting this into the template defence, though there is no need to show us.
Regarding the change of the signs, ChatGPT suggested:
The Defendant asserts that no contract was formed due to the inadequate signage and lack of meaningful opportunity to review any terms. Furthermore, the fact that the signage in the car park has since been replaced suggests that the previous signage was not fit for purpose — further reinforcing the Defendant's position that the original signs did not provide adequate notice at the time of the alleged incident.
----
0 -
Yes add that but remove ALL of this - below - as none of this information is specified in the POC (do not fill in their holes) and your dashcam evidence comes at WS stage:
"The defendant entered the car park at 8:57:50 (dashcam).The car park shows "2 hours maximum stay only" ('see other signs for details' in small font of course) parking to customers (sign at entrance of the car park)
The defendant subsequently parked the vehicle and is seen exiting the vehicle at 8:58:37am (dashcam) to visit the shop for which the parking is provided for.
Upon returning to the vehicle the defendant noticed a man taking pictures of the vehicle, with nothing to identify who he was, and they did not make any contact with the defendant.
The defendant entered the car and is shown driving away at 9:02:59am as seen in dash cam footage."
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Stupid question: I put a digital signature on the pdf. Should I have typed my NAME under the signature? I already sent it to email. My name is on the very beginning top of the document template.
0 -
Digital signature is OK, so long as it was your name1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards