📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

SIPP vs DB early and drawdown charges

Hi all, I am 60 and retired with a company DB pension which is covering my basic costs.  I also have a SIPP with iWEB which has the DC part of my employers pension.  Finally I have a small LGPS pension (5 years employment).  To increase my income I am considering either drawing my LGPS pension early or drawing down on my SIPP.  Two questions:

LGPS early or SIPP drawdown? Why??

With iWeb the annual fee for Flexi-access drawdown is £180 per annum.  Is that reasonable or is there a significantly better option for SIPP drawdown?  (Happy with iWeb so far)

Thanks all
"For every complicated problem, there is always a simple, wrong answer"

Comments

  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,224 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    What is the size of your DC pot? a fixed charge is better for large pots, but not so good for small ones. A £180 increase above a basic SIPP charge for drawdown seems higher than most but other companies may well charge more for the basic option. II for example charge £12.99/month for a SIPP with no extra charge for drawdown. Then there are transaction charges to compare.
  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,289 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    How many years early for the LGPS, and what is the reduction for doing so?
    Maybe you could compromise by taking just the tax-free amount from the DC and use that to live on for a year or two. Thereby lowering the reduction for taking the DB early, and (maybe) not paying actual drawdown charges (I don't know iWeb's charges structure so can't be definate on that).
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,285 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    Basically iweb are super cheap/almost free when just accumulating a pension. So inevitably they have extra charges for some actions.
    Other providers charge more when accumulating the pension, but do not charge extra for drawdown.
  • k6chris
    k6chris Posts: 784 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thanks all.  Looking at options, Interactive Investors charge £12.99 x 12 months (£156 pa) charges and no additional charges for drawdown.  iWeb charge £45 x 4 qts (£180pa) and and additional £180pa for drawdown.  I am not a frequent trader, maybe 2-3 trades per year to rebalance.  Unless I am missing something it would make sense to transfer my SIPP to ii?  Any gotchas in doing this?  Any experience??  Thanks
    "For every complicated problem, there is always a simple, wrong answer"
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,542 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    On your other question, taking LGPS early looks like a bad deal, unless you have short life expectancy etc. See

    Taking your pension :: LGPS (lgpsmember.org)

  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,289 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Looks like ii have a transfer offer at the moment

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,285 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    k6chris said:
    Thanks all.  Looking at options, Interactive Investors charge £12.99 x 12 months (£156 pa) charges and no additional charges for drawdown.  iWeb charge £45 x 4 qts (£180pa) and and additional £180pa for drawdown.  I am not a frequent trader, maybe 2-3 trades per year to rebalance.  Unless I am missing something it would make sense to transfer my SIPP to ii?  Any gotchas in doing this?  Any experience??  Thanks
    It depends on the size of the pot, which you have not mentioned. A fixed fee provider like II, is more suited to pots > £100K .
    For smaller pots a provider charging a % of the fund usually works out better, although the exact cut off point will vary.
    Also it matters whether you are invested in OEIC funds ( most people are ) or not. 
  • k6chris
    k6chris Posts: 784 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    k6chris said:
    Thanks all.  Looking at options, Interactive Investors charge £12.99 x 12 months (£156 pa) charges and no additional charges for drawdown.  iWeb charge £45 x 4 qts (£180pa) and and additional £180pa for drawdown.  I am not a frequent trader, maybe 2-3 trades per year to rebalance.  Unless I am missing something it would make sense to transfer my SIPP to ii?  Any gotchas in doing this?  Any experience??  Thanks
    It depends on the size of the pot, which you have not mentioned. A fixed fee provider like II, is more suited to pots > £100K .
    For smaller pots a provider charging a % of the fund usually works out better, although the exact cut off point will vary.
    Also it matters whether you are invested in OEIC funds ( most people are ) or not. 

    Just under £200k and no OEIC funds.  Thanks
    "For every complicated problem, there is always a simple, wrong answer"
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,285 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    k6chris said:
    k6chris said:
    Thanks all.  Looking at options, Interactive Investors charge £12.99 x 12 months (£156 pa) charges and no additional charges for drawdown.  iWeb charge £45 x 4 qts (£180pa) and and additional £180pa for drawdown.  I am not a frequent trader, maybe 2-3 trades per year to rebalance.  Unless I am missing something it would make sense to transfer my SIPP to ii?  Any gotchas in doing this?  Any experience??  Thanks
    It depends on the size of the pot, which you have not mentioned. A fixed fee provider like II, is more suited to pots > £100K .
    For smaller pots a provider charging a % of the fund usually works out better, although the exact cut off point will vary.
    Also it matters whether you are invested in OEIC funds ( most people are ) or not. 

    Just under £200k and no OEIC funds.  Thanks
    Some providers that charge a % , have caps on fees for ETF's, shares and Investment Trusts.
    HL - £200
    Fidelity - £90
    AJ Bell - £120
  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 9,911 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    edited 16 August 2024 at 1:59PM
    k6chris said:
    k6chris said:
    Thanks all.  Looking at options, Interactive Investors charge £12.99 x 12 months (£156 pa) charges and no additional charges for drawdown.  iWeb charge £45 x 4 qts (£180pa) and and additional £180pa for drawdown.  I am not a frequent trader, maybe 2-3 trades per year to rebalance.  Unless I am missing something it would make sense to transfer my SIPP to ii?  Any gotchas in doing this?  Any experience??  Thanks
    It depends on the size of the pot, which you have not mentioned. A fixed fee provider like II, is more suited to pots > £100K .
    For smaller pots a provider charging a % of the fund usually works out better, although the exact cut off point will vary.
    Also it matters whether you are invested in OEIC funds ( most people are ) or not. 
    Just under £200k and no OEIC funds.  Thanks
    HL would charge nearly half for that at £200. IWeb are great for ISAs and GIAs, less so for SIPPs
    Fidelity could be worth a look, £90 fee cap
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.