We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Suspected LBC letter, a little confused.
Comments
-
Quickly, We've just gotten an Automatic reply from DCBLegal. Have to see what comes of it, if anything.1
-
Hello everyone. They have returned.
Received a letter from dcbLegal LTD today. They are now asking for proof that my grandmother is indeed disabled. The letter reads, "for your circumstances to be taken into consideration appropriately, please provide documentation demonstrating the nature of the potential vulnerability".
I'm not sure if I should send them this or not and that will make them stop OR it's not their business? I'm unsure. I wasn't expecting them to send a request like this since this is the first time they've even acknowledged any disability in the two years this has been going on.0 -
Both parties are required to try and narrow the issue by the court pre-action protocol. Consequently, it would be perfectly reasonable for you to do this by providing proof of a disability. It does not need to be detailed. It can be redacted as long as the basics are provided, for example suitable redacted medical documents or a letter from a medical professional.
If they are rejected by the other party, then you can use that to demonstrate their unreasonable behaviour and failure to narrow the issue. You would of course need the grandmother's permission to do this, ideally in writing.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.
All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks2 -
thank you for your reply. We'll send it detail off to them then. She has plenty of documents for proof so it shouldn't be an issue.Fruitcake said:Both parties are required to try and narrow the issue by the court pre-action protocol. Consequently, it would be perfectly reasonable for you to do this by providing proof of a disability. It does not need to be detailed. It can be redacted as long as the basics are provided, for example suitable redacted medical documents or a letter from a medical professional.
If they are rejected by the other party, then you can use that to demonstrate their unreasonable behaviour and failure to narrow the issue. You would of course need the grandmother's permission to do this, ideally in writing.1 -
Don't let her post it. Email it.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Thank you for the advice, the email has been sent off.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards