We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply

Dry Cleaning dispute - advice needed on next steps

I’ll try to keep it short. I took 2 quilts and one wool mattress topper to local dry cleaners. Wool topper is dry clean only and I advised the shop of this. However, they washed the topper and it has now shrunk but they have accepted it was their mistake. They offered to purchase a replacement for me but the one they offered to buy was a non-branded cheaper item, whereas mine was a Hypnos topper. 

I advised that I was unhappy with the alternative offered and wanted it replaced like for like i.e. a hypnos one. They initially agreed and asked me to send them the receipt of when I bought it (2 years previously) and I also sent them the link to where I purchased it in order for them to buy the replacement. Obviously it is now more expensive, I bought it for £219 and it now costs £355 and they have subsequently refused to replace like for like and have offered me cash only to the amount I paid originally. They have also refused to return the original item to me or, to refund the cost of the dry cleaning. They claim they need to keep my original topper in order for them to make a claim from their insurance but once I pushed a little on this, they changed their response to if they reimburse my original costs they now ‘own’ my original topper.

The shop owner has been extremely rude and aggressive so I have ceased trying to reach agreement with them but am looking for advice on whether or not I am being unreasonable or indeed not within my rights to request a like for like replacement, my original topper returned and refund of the dry cleaning costs? I realise that any compensation is likely to include a wear and tear element so had suggested as a compromise and in order not to escalate the matter, that I would accept what I originally paid, plus the original topper returned to me. 

I really don’t want to have to go down the small claims route so any advice very gratefully received. For context there were no t&cs made available to me at the point of depositing the dry cleaning and cannot locate any on their website.
«1

Comments

  • littleboo
    littleboo Posts: 1,858 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 6 July 2024 at 7:33AM
    Why do you want the shrunk topper back, is it usable? Surely its either usable but damaged - compensation for the damage but keep the topper, or it's not usable - some payment towards a replacement, less wear and tear, but the topper is theirs. 
  • PHK
    PHK Posts: 2,575 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    You are not going to get money and the original topper. Not least because that would be betterment. 

    It will also be needed for an insurance claim and will become the property of the insurance company (although they may waive that right but it’s their decision)

    You are entitled to a two year old Hypnos mattress topper or the cost of a second hand/refurbished Hypnos mattress topper of equivalent age. 

    Personally I would have accepted the £219. 
  • If the topper was say a month old I think it would be fair to expect a new one but as it’s two years old you have had that period of use, I’m not sure how long such an item should last as we’ve never had one but I think that should be factored in.

    They should refund the dry cleaning fee for the topper but it depends on how generous £219 is compared to lifespan. 

    I’d agree with the dry cleaner in that they should keep the topper if you are refunded a fair proportion for it. :)
    In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces
  • uss_tish
    uss_tish Posts: 115 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks for all the advice. I wanted the topper back either to re-use on a smaller bed, although having not seen it I don’t know what state it is in, or, donate to charity. 

    On balance, it seems advice would be to accept £219 and refund of cleaning fee? 
  • uss_tish
    uss_tish Posts: 115 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 6 July 2024 at 10:37AM
    Update - the father (and I presume company owner) of the shop assistant I have been dealing with has just called and has offered to replace like with like. I explained the price increase so he is getting back to me next week once he talks to the insurance company. Have to say he was lovely compared to his rude and aggressive son. 
  • powerful_Rogue
    powerful_Rogue Posts: 8,657 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Then I wouldn't push for a refund of the dry cleaning fee. Remember you're only entitled to a dirty 2 year old topper instead of a brand new clean one.

  • cannugec5
    cannugec5 Posts: 709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    uss_tish said:
    Thanks for all the advice. I wanted the topper back either to re-use on a smaller bed, although having not seen it I don’t know what state it is in, or, donate to charity. 

    On balance, it seems advice would be to accept £219 and refund of cleaning fee? 

    Here, in Scotland, charity shops are only permitted to accept bedding that is brand new, for hygiene reasons. 
    Bed linen on the other hand is acceptable. 
  • PHK
    PHK Posts: 2,575 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    uss_tish said:
    Update - the father (and I presume company owner) of the shop assistant I have been dealing with has just called and has offered to replace like with like. I explained the price increase so he is getting back to me next week once he talks to the insurance company. Have to say he was lovely compared to his rude and aggressive son. 
    Notice he said like for like, not new for old. 


  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,660 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    uss_tish said:
    Update - the father (and I presume company owner) of the shop assistant I have been dealing with has just called and has offered to replace like with like. I explained the price increase so he is getting back to me next week once he talks to the insurance company. Have to say he was lovely compared to his rude and aggressive son. 
    Like for like would be a 2 year old second hand one of the same brand...

    If they've offered the price you paid for it 2 years ago then I'd accept that!
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • uss_tish
    uss_tish Posts: 115 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Just to clarify it would be new.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.