We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
IHT VALUATION OF AN ESTATE FOR JOINTLY OWNED PROPERTY
KallyM5
Posts: 8 Forumite
in Cutting tax
If parents and 2 children own the main home as joint tenants and one passes away what value is included to calculate the estate of the deceased or does the property just pass on to the remaining joint tenants without any IHT consequences. Thank you
0
Comments
-
For IHT purposes his share is treated as taxable estate. The portion passing to his spouse is exempt, the portion passing to his children will use up some of his NRB, and some of his RNRB if his share is worth more than £325k.
it would probably be better if the tenancy is converted to tenants in common with appropriate wills being put in place for all four of you.0 -
Thank you. Another question. Even if it has been over 7 years since the names were added as joint tenants do you still need to include his share as taxable estate or would this only apply with tenants in common situation.0
-
Assuming your parents are the sole occupiers of the house and they gifted half the house to you and your sibling, then the 7 year rule does not apply as it is a gift with reservation of benefit, so for IHT purposes half of the house falls inside his estate not 25%. It does not matter how the house is owned as far as IHT is concerned.KallyM5 said:Thank you. Another question. Even if it has been over 7 years since the names were added as joint tenants do you still need to include his share as taxable estate or would this only apply with tenants in common situation.
Are both your parents still alive? What is the value of the property?0 -
Both parents alive. Property value £1.5m.0
-
If you don’t live with your parents then as it stands there is a significant IHT liability on their estates because, unless they are paying you full market rent for your share of the property the 7 year rule does not apply. For IHT purposes the estate of the first to die is going to be liable for a substantial amount of IHT on the house alone because only a small portion is going to be subject to spousal exemption and the rest will use up all their NRB and RNRB. IHT on the first death can easily be avoided by severing the tenancy and your parents having wills in place that leave their share to the surviving spouse.KallyM5 said:Both parents alive. Property value £1.5m.
If this was done to save IHT the plan was seriously flawed as it saves nothing and if the house is sold it also lumbers you with a CGT liability on top.
1 -
by severing he means all 4 remain as owners, but as tenants in common.Keep_pedalling said:
IHT on the first death can easily be avoided by severing the tenancy and your parents having wills in place that leave their share to the surviving spouse.KallyM5 said:Both parents alive. Property value £1.5m.
If this was done to save IHT the plan was seriously flawed as it saves nothing and if the house is sold it also lumbers you with a CGT liability on top.
If ownership reverts to parents only that would trigger a CGT disposal and make CGT payable now by the 2 children despite the fact no cash would change hands on the "sale" of their shares back to parents. The children are now stuck with a CGT liability they cannot cancel, but the IHT planning can certainly be improved as keep pedalling suggests1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
