We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Freeholder locked cellar where the meters are - is this allowed?
Options
Comments
-
Service charge would then increase to cover the costanselld said:As above, the rtm should manage the building including keys, access and the asbestos issue.The Freeholder should not be interfering. If the Freeholder is really liable for the remediation then the rtm should be enforcing that, however that seems very unlikely. Much more likely that the rtm should address the asbestos under the service charge.
Removal is not always the best option so professional advice should be taken on how best to manage safely whilst preserving access.0 -
Yes, unless there is a contingency fund there is no other source of money so that is inevitable.35har1old said:
Service charge would then increase to cover the costanselld said:As above, the rtm should manage the building including keys, access and the asbestos issue.The Freeholder should not be interfering. If the Freeholder is really liable for the remediation then the rtm should be enforcing that, however that seems very unlikely. Much more likely that the rtm should address the asbestos under the service charge.
Removal is not always the best option so professional advice should be taken on how best to manage safely whilst preserving access.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards