Judgments Link

Coupon-mad

And because it was at appeal level he didn't have the RoA he would have had at a 'normal' first hearing.

LDast

In the judgements file, the last page of the CPM v Akande appeal judgement is missing. Does anyone have page 4 of the judgment?

Le_Kirk

LDast said:

In the judgements file, the last page of the CPM v Akande appeal judgement is missing. Does anyone have page 4 of the judgment?

Yes, it is only the usual technical waffle about how the judgment was recorded,.

Page 4of 4
This Transcript has been approved by the Judge.
The Transcription Agency hereby certifies that the above is an
accurate and complete recording of the proceedings or part thereof.
The Transcription Agency, 24-28 High Street, Hythe, Kent, CT21 5AT
Tel: 01303 230038
Email: court@thetranscriptionagency.com

Also, if you scroll back to page one, you will find the post by @Grizebeck where he posts the dropbox link.

Le_Kirk

Anyone finding this from the NEWBIES should also read what @Coupon-mad wrote on this thread about words to add when using the Judgments link: -
14 August at 8:52PM <<<< LINK

A recent defence for Gladstones, CEL (in-house only), BW Legal, Elms Legal and Moorside Legal claims and specifically also for DCB Legal only when it's a ParkingEye claim: -
3 January at 3:14PM <<<<LINK

This link shows Chan_Akande only and doesn't need the extra words below in first paragraph

People can just say in their WS that the first two transcripts are both persuasive appeal judgments, and then the other judgments and strike out Orders demonstrate the path taken by many District Judges in the English Courts since 2023, fully aligning with the findings by His Honour Judge Murch (Luton) and Her Honour Judge Evans (Manchester).

........and the start of paragraph #2 in the @hharry100 defence

2. The Defendant draws to the attention of the allocating Judge that there is are now a two persuasive Appeal judgments to support striking out the claim (in these exact circumstances of typically poorly pleaded private parking claims, and the extant PoCs seen here are far worse than the ones seen on Appeal). 

skintbutwantstosave

Please can you post links to Excel v Edwards on this thread as well as other helpful judgements as the links in some the threads are not clickable or do not work for some reason. 

Le_Kirk

It's VCS v Edward here: -
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/w0k19zxzlpf9eumu68u7b/VCS-v-EDWARDS-Transcript.pdf?rlkey=5t2gilebrjx7g0d6jmy32lou4&dl=0
Most judgments can be found by asking Auntie Google, what else can't you find?