We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Married with 2 properties but separating. Future stamp duty?
Options

ryngo
Posts: 31 Forumite


Hi folks,
Wife and I are going to separate. We have 2 properties. We currently live together in our PRR and also have a Rental. We are going to sell the PRR and go our separate ways buying new homes respectively.
Wife and I are going to separate. We have 2 properties. We currently live together in our PRR and also have a Rental. We are going to sell the PRR and go our separate ways buying new homes respectively.
My assumption is that until we divorced we would both then be liable for second home stamp duty on each of our new homes unless we sold both properties? Is this right?
Any way around it? And who’s it best to get advice from about something like this?
0
Comments
-
Best consult a tax advisor.If one of you moved into your second property, such that it would qualify as a primary residence before the divorce, would that work for you? I think it might make sense in the short term, considering CGT.1
-
Mark_d said:Best consult a tax advisor.If one of you moved into your second property, such that it would qualify as a primary residence before the divorce, would that work for you? I think it might make sense in the short term, considering CGT.
I don't know about the SDLT position.1 -
If one of you moved into your second property, such that it would qualify as a primary residence before the divorce, would that work for you? I think it might make sense in the short term, considering CGT.
as for SDLT there is a rule that were the separation is in circumstances likely to be permanent then SDLT additional rate will not apply even if the formal divorce or court order has not (yet) happened.
The fact the current PRR is being sold lends utter credence to that status in your respective cases
SDLTM09820 - SDLT - higher rates for additional dwellings - individuals - purchasing without your spouse or civil partner - Para 9 and 9A Sch4ZA FA2003 - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
SDLTM00550 - Scope: What is chargeable: Exempt transactions: On the ending of a marriage or civil partnership FA03/SCH3/PARA3 and FA03/SCH3/PARA3A - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
The normal 3 year time limit on replacement of main home would however still apply to each of you to exempt you from additional rate.
SDLTM09800 - SDLT - higher rates for additional dwellings: Condition D - general - Para 3(6) Sch 4ZA FA2003 - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
The BLT would be ignored in the circumstance of such separation, you will each pay normal rate SDLT on the basis of replacing main home within the time limit.
see example "Ben"
SDLT and Divorce: Property Transfer and the 3% Surcharge (mercianaccountants.co.uk)
see example "Gary"
SDLT Planning on Divorce | SDLT on Separation | SDLT Experts (propertytaxservices.co.uk)
2 -
yes, you would both have to pay extra stamp duty as you are considered to have another property already. you can claim back the extra stamp duty if you divorce within 3 years of buying the new property but it isn't clear to me as to whether you both could do this or just one of you as an article i found from a tax lawyer seems to indicate that only one of you can claim the refund.
it is a shame that tax is not clear for divorce couples. HMRC is really bad with their info on this.
https://vardags.com/law-guide/divorce-finance-process/stamp-duty-and-the-sale-of-the-marital-home#:~:text=To be exempt from stamp,this exemption does not apply.
1 -
AskAsk said:yes, you would both have to pay extra stamp duty as you are considered to have another property already. you can claim back the extra stamp duty if you divorce within 3 years of buying the new property but it isn't clear to me as to whether you both could do this or just one of you as an article i found from a tax lawyer seems to indicate that only one of you can claim the refund.
it is a shame that tax is not clear for divorce couples. HMRC is really bad with their info on this.
https://vardags.com/law-guide/divorce-finance-process/stamp-duty-and-the-sale-of-the-marital-home#:~:text=To be exempt from stamp,this exemption does not apply.
I agree heartily with the second paragraph.1 -
ryngo said:Hi folks,
Wife and I are going to separate. We have 2 properties. We currently live together in our PRR and also have a Rental. We are going to sell the PRR and go our separate ways buying new homes respectively.My assumption is that until we divorced we would both then be liable for second home stamp duty on each of our new homes unless we sold both properties? Is this right?Any way around it? And who’s it best to get advice from about something like this?
What might work well for SDLT, even if you are keeping the rental, is this order of events:
1. Sell the jointly owned PPR.
2. On the same day, or afterwards, each individually complete a purchase of a new home to live in, at a time when it is clear that you are "separated in circumstances likely to be permanent".
My view of the way the "replacement" rules work, is that you can then both claim the benefit of the replacement rules to escape the 3% extra SDLT. https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/stamp-duty-land-tax-manual/sdltm09800
What would work out badly for SDLT would be, when keeping the rental, to do things in this order:
1. For one of you to first buy a new home.
2. Then you sell your jointly owned PPR.
3. Then (or on the same day as the sale of the PPR) the other of you buy a new home.
I can explain why this works out badly if you like, but it is relatively complicated and this would be an unusual scenario.1 -
Thanks for all the replies.
The rental property is in England, and it wouldn't be easy for one of us to move into it.
It was our home for a few years, then we became accidental landlords.
We moved to N.Ireland where our PRR is now.
If we sell the rental I'm aware we will need to pay CGT minus our time living there.
Fundamentally we want to separate and live apart ideally buying our own properties in N. Ireland.
I'm open minded to the best approach but we would need to sell either of the two properties to fund replacement homes. We are not in a rush, and waiting a year before doing anything helps us with mortgages and ERCs. If we have to move to rentals it wouldn't be ideal but possible or one person buys one rents.
SDLT_Geek makes sense to me but it's how we prove we are "separated in circumstances likely to be permanent" before we are actually divorced.
Beginning to realise this is a bit of a minefield.0 -
ryngo said:but it's how we prove we are "separated in circumstances likely to be permanent" before we are actually divorced.
Beginning to realise this is a bit of a minefield.
there are many places in tax law where individual conditions are not specified, but where the underlying intention of the actions taken support a reasonable conclusion as to what was actually happening.
- you don't live together
- your finances are separate
- you don't share social life together
- you kids (if applic) are well aware their parents are not together and schooling arrangements etc reflect that
- you are openly "heading towards" formal divorce
CH21620 - Information & Inspection Powers: Conditions and safeguards: What we can require or inspect: Reasonably required - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
although it relates to the issue of deciding which is the main home, the Frost v Feltham legal case sets out principles to be used when looking at the facts of someone's living arrangements:
SDLTM09812 - SDLT - higher rates for additional dwellings: Meaning of 'main residence' - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
that said, it is a lot clearer if you take the first step and get a legal separation agreement drawn up
Get a legal separation - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
2 -
Would (either of you) you be buying in N Ireland or England?
1 -
Buying in NI.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards