We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Buying house deemed as high risk for subsidence
Comments
-
Olistanding said:It was a beam that was fitted under an internal wall although that wall has since been removed. Presumably it still serves some purpose in strengthening foundations but isn't under any structural wallIf nothing is sitting on it, it can’t strengthen the foundation.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
-
Olistanding said:tooldle said:Have a chat with the surveyor. London clay is a risk but, so many many houses are built on areas of London clay. Clay expands and contracts with climate conditions. The trees (depending on size) will potentially taking up large volumes of water and this may cause some additional shrinkage. In wet conditions the trees might be seen as a bonus.
It comes down to balance. An underpin 21 years ago with no issues in the intervening period. The alternative to find a property that isn’t built on clay, and that is quite a task if you are in the South.
I did have a chat with the surveyor and he was pretty clear in the point that the property was at a greater risk of subsidence than others in the area. His main rational to this seemed to be the presence of trees close to the property that were on public land and the neighbours land, and the fact it had previously suffered from subsidence. However, I can't find much evidence that previous issue with subsidence a long time ago makes it more likely to happen again and many other properties in the area have trees nearby. Think I night try and get a second opinion. Other reasons he mentioned were the soil type and shallow foundations but that's the same for most houses in the area.
I guess the other thing is whether we think the stigma around it having had subsidence in the past is likely to impact on what we can sell it for regardless of whether its a continuing issue
Whatever you decide, good luck OP.0 -
Thanks, when we were initially told it had been underpinned we had thought it was done fully so were reassured but now it appears the partial underpinning conducted no longer serves a purpose0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards