We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Chattels valuation: is it proportionate?
Comments
-
No ebay seller would expect, or get, prices anywhere near those. 2nd hand goods are not worth much.And HMRC are not stupid. They look carefully at contracts where the price is at, or near, a SDLT threshold, and will almost certainly conclude that the chattels are over-priced as a mechanism to keep the property price below the threshold.0
-
Fair comment, but IF the chattels are generally good quality/good condition, then I think you could have a good attempt at justifying £3,500 for a ready furnished house. Maybe need some photo evidence.p00hsticks said:
In this case it's going to be a bit more than 'a thousand pounds here or there' though, isn't it ?Albermarle said:Maybe HMRC would take a different view, but would they really be interested in arguing over a thousand Pounds here of there?
It's not just the value of the chattels, its the impact they have on SDLT.
by my calculation (please correct me if I'm wrong), first time buyers paying £625k would pay £10k SDLT (5% on 625k - 425,001) whereas at £630k, too high to benefit from the first time buyer relief, it would be £19k ( 5% on 630k - 250,001)
Stamp Duty Land Tax: Residential property rates - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
I think the difference is big enough to attract HMRC's attention, as it will be pretty obvious that it's an effort to avoid a higher SDLT bill.
I had a quick look just now and the price of a used bed and mattress is closer to 100, nothing like the 400 you put down.
New beds and mattresses can cost hundreds or thousands. A good quality second hand bed in situ, has more value than a random one on e bay that you have to arrange delivery of etc.
The reality is that without physically inspecting the contents of the house, nobody can say what the value is.0 -
It may be okay for the OP to have stuff already in the flat, but it works both ways. The vendor is spared the cost of moving everything out. It's quite likely that the landlord would happily give the contents away for nothing with the flat, to save the cost of disposing of it.Albermarle said:
Fair comment, but IF the chattels are generally good quality/good condition, then I think you could have a good attempt at justifying £3,500 for a ready furnished house. Maybe need some photo evidence.p00hsticks said:
In this case it's going to be a bit more than 'a thousand pounds here or there' though, isn't it ?Albermarle said:Maybe HMRC would take a different view, but would they really be interested in arguing over a thousand Pounds here of there?
It's not just the value of the chattels, its the impact they have on SDLT.
by my calculation (please correct me if I'm wrong), first time buyers paying £625k would pay £10k SDLT (5% on 625k - 425,001) whereas at £630k, too high to benefit from the first time buyer relief, it would be £19k ( 5% on 630k - 250,001)
Stamp Duty Land Tax: Residential property rates - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
I think the difference is big enough to attract HMRC's attention, as it will be pretty obvious that it's an effort to avoid a higher SDLT bill.
I had a quick look just now and the price of a used bed and mattress is closer to 100, nothing like the 400 you put down.
New beds and mattresses can cost hundreds or thousands. A good quality second hand bed in situ, has more value than a random one on e bay that you have to arrange delivery of etc.
The reality is that without physically inspecting the contents of the house, nobody can say what the value is.
This is clearly an attempt by the estate agent to push some of the flat purchase price onto essentially worthless chattels. There's a good chance of the OP being saddled with a large SDLT charge if he goes along with it.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
