Claim form received from civil enforcement LTD

1505grandad

"8.3. As such, the Claimant has no basis to pursue this claim against me as the registered keeper of the vehicle."

But did you not state in your Defence doc. (below) that you were the driver?:-

"The defendant was a paying patron at the establishment, where the defendant parked there wasn't signage in the line of sight. 

Bobbob5655

Ill remove the whole of 8 as I have admitted to being the driver on the day in question. after this will it be a sufficient WS? thanks again for any help

Coupon-mad

Yes & no.  I think you are better saying in 10 (or whatever number it ends up as) that no signs were seen and must have been wholly inadequate, rather than blame large vans (which isn't the Claimant's fault).

Bobbob5655

Just to let people know my situation, went to court today. CEL. Didn’t turn up and found out they didn’t pay the trial fee so it was struck out and I was awarded £130 for loss of earnings. 

Thanks so much for all your help in owe you 

Coupon-mad

Bobbob5655 said:

Just to let people know my situation, went to court today. CEL. Didn’t turn up and found out they didn’t pay the trial fee so it was struck out and I was awarded £130 for loss of earnings. 

Thanks so much for all your help in owe you 

Brilliant news! What a waste of your time.

ANOTHER CEL ONE BITES THE DUST!