We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
ETF domicile
Comments
-
I've had a cursory look with one pair of ETFs, actual 5 year history would support that there is negligible overall benefit after costs. But in theory, as outlined above, there is a benefit to be had in theory subject to the vagaries of tracking error for the physical ETF and a sufficiently low cost for synthetic.george4064 said:Therefore you don’t benefit from avoiding US withholding tax by investing synthetically, just that you forgo the benefit of after tax dividends (whether they’re automatically reinvested or distributed).
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards