We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply

Do you see any anomalies?

Ivkoto · 2024-04-29 09:39:14

Hello everyone. Could you please give me your opinion on how well the portfolio is diversified (around 4400 companies in total) ? Is it heavy in some sectors and light in others as a percentage wise ( with view of the top 10 holdings in each sectors )? Does it make any sense for a not risk averse person, who won't touch…

Comments

Ivkoto Posts: 103 Forumite

29 April 2024 at 4:05PM

Linton said:

2% bonds is a waste of time and effort. Anything less than perhaps 5% will make so little difference that it’s not worth holding..

Thank you. As I said earlier, the logic behind this was to increase it each year with 1% to 2%, while contributing and when I stop, it'll be in the 15-20% region. During the retirement I don't think to go over 20% in bonds.

0