We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
single fund
Comments
-
Thats what I asked the 'investment coach' from Bestinvest who called me when their algorithm highlighted I might not be diversified enough. Apparently that was because I had a substantial sum invested solely in one fund - specifically HMWO.Alistair31 said:How do you diversify a global tracker?Sent her away with a flea in her ear saying their algorithm was overly simplistic nonsense. Another reason I'm not with them anymore...1 -
So if you had put half of HMWO funds into another world tracker fund, they wouldn't have called you? Their algorithm was to measure the number of funds, not that you had the vast majority in one asset class? Sounds very poorartyboy said:
Thats what I asked the 'investment coach' from Bestinvest who called me when their algorithm highlighted I might not be diversified enough. Apparently that was because I had a substantial sum invested solely in one fund - specifically HMWO.Alistair31 said:How do you diversify a global tracker?Sent her away with a flea in her ear saying their algorithm was overly simplistic nonsense. Another reason I'm not with them anymore...0 -
1/12 at Betfair, not worth a cheeky lay even at those odds
0 -
Possibly even two would have flagged, she was a bit embarrassed by the fact it had got picked up, I suggested that the algorithm needed some diversity training, but I don't think she got itCus said:
So if you had put half of HMWO funds into another world tracker fund, they wouldn't have called you? Their algorithm was to measure the number of funds, not that you had the vast majority in one asset class? Sounds very poorartyboy said:
Thats what I asked the 'investment coach' from Bestinvest who called me when their algorithm highlighted I might not be diversified enough. Apparently that was because I had a substantial sum invested solely in one fund - specifically HMWO.Alistair31 said:How do you diversify a global tracker?Sent her away with a flea in her ear saying their algorithm was overly simplistic nonsense. Another reason I'm not with them anymore...
As if I don't get enough nanny-stating with pensions...0 -
If the OP has a global equity tracker they can diversify the asset class with some bonds and cash and if they have that HSBC global strategy balanced fund then they are already well diversified and I'd just put more into that. I would make sure you are using tax advantaged funds to the max you can ie ISAs and workplace pensions as well as SIPPs.
Any investment strategy is going to have to deal with the uncertainties of governments and their politics and diversification helps that ie avoid single shares. I'm sure Thames Water investors are sweating right now. If you lived in Argentina then you would be in real difficulty wrt inflation and exchange rates. But the UK is reasonably stable (we'll ignore those 49 days in 2022) and the major parties all have pretty catholic economic polices, but there will be areas of different emphasis. I don't see any major issues for the regular retail investor with whatever party forms the next government.And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.2 -
1/12 is to have the most seats . Labour majority on Betfair exchange is only around 1/7. Although in their Sportsbook they are 1/14 !ColdIron said:1/12 at Betfair, not worth a cheeky lay even at those odds1 -
Albermarle said:
1/12 is to have the most seats . Labour majority on Betfair exchange is only around 1/7. Although in their Sportsbook they are 1/14 !ColdIron said:1/12 at Betfair, not worth a cheeky lay even at those oddsYou are of course correct, I quoted most seats. Either looks nailed on but with the date unknown it's not worth a punt yet as you could lie up a lot of money for quite a long time for a low returnI think the Conservative seats is a more interesting market. A year ago I guessed somewhere around Miliband's 2015 232 level but not down to Corbyn's 2019 202 low. 100-149 seems to be the place to be nowApols to the OP, this thread has gone way off course, but I think the advice so far to stay where you are is correct0 -
@Hoenir I do have an investment property but other than that yes0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
