We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mortgage for over 60 in home with no building regs certificate?
Options

Mendip9876
Posts: 3 Newbie

My husband and I have been living in our home since the 1990s. The house was built in 1986. The house has no building regs certificate from when it was originally built and is slightly larger then the original planning permission allowed. Our mortgage lender was happy to lend to us as the previous owner had a mortgage. Our current mortgage comes to an end in 2 years when we will be 65. We intend to remain in the house for the foreseeable future.
We think that it will be difficult to sell our home without a building regs certificate if we pay off our mortgage.
We own an investment property with a separate mortgage. The buy-to-let mortgage will move to the expensive variable rate in July so it is time to change mortgages on the investment property. I'm thinking of looking to re-mortgage and increase the mortgage on the house we live in instead. I'd look for a mortgage term of 17 years (which would mean we'd both be 79 and would likely downsize before then). The total loan would be £160k. Our house is worth at least £800k.
Can I be honest with a broker or lender as to why I want such a long term mortgage. E.g. share the fact that our main house has no building regs certificate?
Paying the mortgage is not an issue. We have plenty of liquidity; it is purely about not limiting ourselves to cash only buyers when we are ready to move from our house.
We think that it will be difficult to sell our home without a building regs certificate if we pay off our mortgage.
We own an investment property with a separate mortgage. The buy-to-let mortgage will move to the expensive variable rate in July so it is time to change mortgages on the investment property. I'm thinking of looking to re-mortgage and increase the mortgage on the house we live in instead. I'd look for a mortgage term of 17 years (which would mean we'd both be 79 and would likely downsize before then). The total loan would be £160k. Our house is worth at least £800k.
Can I be honest with a broker or lender as to why I want such a long term mortgage. E.g. share the fact that our main house has no building regs certificate?
Paying the mortgage is not an issue. We have plenty of liquidity; it is purely about not limiting ourselves to cash only buyers when we are ready to move from our house.
0
Comments
-
Given the ago of your existing house the chance of being asked about building regs is pretty much zero.
It certainly is not something I would worry about0 -
You won’t be asked about planning permission or building regs going back 40 years.Fashion on the Ration
2024 - 43/66 coupons used, carry forward 23
2025 - 62/890 -
GrumpyDil said:Given the ago of your existing house the chance of being asked about building regs is pretty much zero.
It certainly is not something I would worry about0 -
Sarahspangles said:You won’t be asked about planning permission or building regs going back 40 years.
0 -
Mendip9876 said:Sarahspangles said:You won’t be asked about planning permission or building regs going back 40 years.1
-
Mendip9876 said:Sarahspangles said:You won’t be asked about planning permission or building regs going back 40 years.I’m aware it’s becoming more common for vendors to be asked for evidence of planning and building control consent and compliance. There are scenarios - relating to recent work - where this is a reasonable question. But too often it’s an inexperienced conveyancer (rather than solicitor) ticking a box and creating a wild goose chase for evidence of something that wasn’t required and so never took place. Essentially, proving a negative. One way of getting over the impasse is for the vendor to pay for an (unnecessary) insurance policy. They’re inexpensive - as they’re hardly ever claimed on - but it’s the principle I object to…..
In your case this isn’t relevant as from the description your house is ‘as built’.
I’ll get off my high horse now.Fashion on the Ration
2024 - 43/66 coupons used, carry forward 23
2025 - 62/891
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards