We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Anyone dumping Fundsmith?

13»

Comments

  • aroominyork
    aroominyork Posts: 3,638 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Linton said:
    Prism said:
    ColdIron said:
    Just idle curiosity on a lazy Sunday morning, VWRP rather than VHVG?
    I have quite a bit of VWRP in one of my accounts but will soon start switching some funds in one of mWhen y ISAs to a tracker and am strongly considering developed world only. VWRP is more diverse for sure but I'm not 100% sold on the value of EM over a shortish period, I'm no spring chicken any more
    I am of the same mind.  I have used an allocation to emerging markets all the way through accumulation but as I get get closer to retirement I am intending on removing direct EM exposure and just getting it through developed markets. All the evidence I have seen suggests that EM exposure increases gains slightly over the long term, but I would prefer a slightly reduced more stable return.  Not quite ready to pull the plug on a China upturn just yet - but soon.
    I take a different view.  Since I dont use growth investments for short/medium term income I am not planning on using my growth investments for 10 years or more, small companies  and EM at around 20-25% (almost entirely SE Asia) seem fine to me.  Furthermore since a key requirement is to control specific risk I want to keep US within 40-45% of the total.  This leaves plenty of % space for other things.  
    Same here. When I started DIYing I was nervous about the level of US exposure global weighting would give. Linton's previous posts, and reading about a model of 40% US, 30% UK/Europe and 30% Japan/AP/EM seemed sensible. Obviously being underweight US hasn't played out well recently but I'm not going to meddle now, beyond having let US move higher up a 40-45% range. ChesterDog's analysis is interesting but I am not going to drop Fundsmith (I hold Sustainable to avoid Philip Morris so I missed the Meta boost). I think the strategy is sound, although maybe a little of the reason is so I can feel smug about choosing TS over Nick Train. I never felt comfortable with NT's obsession with brands; TS's broader perspective and inclusion of B2B as well as B2C seems so much more rounded.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.