We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

PIP Appeal

Options
The DWP have submitted their response but there is a basic error in there reasoning.

They have declared that I do not have not have any mental health issues anymore. But I have been on antipsychotics and antidepressants for the last 6 years with a diagnosis of Delusional Disorder and my symptoms are ongoing. The medication I am on and my diagnosis are included in their report.

Do I address this with them directly or via the appeal portal?
I'm Ever hopeful!
:j:j:j:j

Comments

  • Scrinja
    Scrinja Posts: 21 Forumite
    10 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The DWP have submitted their response but there is a basic error in there reasoning.

    They have declared that I do not have not have any mental health issues anymore. But I have been on antipsychotics and antidepressants for the last 6 years with a diagnosis of Delusional Disorder and my symptoms are ongoing. The medication I am on and my diagnosis are included in their report.

    Do I address this with them directly or via the appeal portal?
    I think it would be best to appeal if they have the information in the report it can be verified by your Doctor very easily
    If they want to confirm it you cant rely on them to get anything right it seems well put in place to make things as awkward as posible for all claimints
    Good Luck 

  • Crazydennie
    Crazydennie Posts: 257 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    I have already appealed and Dwp have responded to the appeal. And I have the option to send further evidence. But this is not new evidence they already have this information so do the dwp read the further evidence through the appeal?  or do i call the dwp and tell them that they have this information and it has been missed.
    I'm Ever hopeful!
    :j:j:j:j
  • tacpot12
    tacpot12 Posts: 9,253 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I don't see that you have anything to lose by sending in further 'evidence' that reminds them of what information they already hold AND the interpretation you want them to put on it. They will either ignore it or take the opportunity of avoiding going to an appeal and looking daft, especially as your new 'evidence' will have to be included in the bundle. 
    The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.
  • Muttleythefrog
    Muttleythefrog Posts: 20,416 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 12 April 2024 at 12:10AM
    Agree with tacpot12. If they are saying you no longer have Mental Health problems (at time of their decision) and you have had ongoing diagnosed and medicated such problems I'd be tempted to send in further evidence to refute their assertion including highlighting their own submissions/evidence that supports your position. Ultimately you are now dealing with the independent appeal although as tacpot suggests there is small potential for the DWP to see the evidence and react to it (such as by trying to avoid appeal/ make an offer).

    Crucially though don't lose focus (at any point in claiming PIP) of the activity descriptors and explaining the applicability of relevant ones.
    "Do not attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by incompetence" - rogerblack
  • Spoonie_Turtle
    Spoonie_Turtle Posts: 10,315 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Do you mean they have all the evidence already and thus anything you can send is not technically 'further' evidence?  If you're up to it then no harm in sending copies of the relevant parts of the same evidence highlighting why they're wrong, basically.  And as Muttley says, focusing still on the descriptors.
  • Thanks all. Yes they have all the evidence.  I will do as suggested and highlight to emphasise the points they have got wrong/missed
    I'm Ever hopeful!
    :j:j:j:j
  • Alice_Holt
    Alice_Holt Posts: 6,094 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Send your additional submission directly to the Tribunal Service not to the DWP, pointing out the errors in the DWP submission and reiterating how your poor mental health impacts on the PIP descriptors.

    You can get a copy of your medical records from your surgery at no charge (by requesting a Subject Access request). If this confirms the DWP statement is incorrect then you can also submit this to the tribunal. (Note that often a tribunal will request the claimant to obtain and submit their medical records where there is a dispute about health conditions).

    If this was a renewal refusal then get family members / carers / support workers to confirm that your condition and ability to reliably perform the PIP descriptors on the majority of days has not improved. 
    Alice Holt Forest situated some 4 miles south of Farnham forms the most northerly gateway to the South Downs National Park.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.