PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Transfer of Equity

Options
Hi, we are currently in process of buying out partners ex wife from their property.
We have arranged mortgage and have a solicitor etc and ex wife is keen to sort asap and keep her costs to a minimum, so she doesnt want to have her own solicitor and is happy to sign some form of waiver. Our mortgage advisor confirmed that this is ok, however our solicitor is insisting she needs representation and won't proceed without getting this confirmation. Ex wife just wants to agree to the amount she is getting (50% of equity) and for our solicitor to arrange to file any legal documents needed. Is there a legal requirement on this or is it just our solicitors?
Anyone have insight or experience of this at all?

Comments

  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 14,096 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Options
    Your solicitors. You can change solicitors I suppose, but will be easier if she just goes somewhere for some cheap and cheerful advice.
  • glennevis
    glennevis Posts: 642 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post Name Dropper
    Options
    All parties need representation and to avoid conflict of interest separate conveyancers. Solicitors duty of care means they won't represent both of you.

    If the ex wants to keep costs down could she try the cheapest 'no completion no fee' conveyancing firm she can find?
  • swingaloo
    swingaloo Posts: 2,751 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    Its a case of what is fair.  She needs a solicitor because with divorce there could be coercion or she may not understand what she is entitled to (I'm not saying this is the case here) but there is a duty of care on the solicitors part to ensure fairness for both sides.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 14,096 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 28 March at 9:34PM
    Options
    glennevis said:
    All parties need representation and to avoid conflict of interest separate conveyancers.
    The ex doesn't strictly speaking need to be represented, but many solicitors may be reluctant to get involved with a party who is unrepresented (in case fingers are later pointed about the unrepresented party being misled).
    If the ex wants to keep costs down could she try the cheapest 'no completion no fee' conveyancing firm she can find?
    That's probably not going to be the cheapest option - no need to worry about "no completion" unless the OP's other half and their ex have a reconciliation!
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.1K Life & Family
  • 248K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards