We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Personal savings allowance and staying out of higher rate tax band

1235

Comments

  • pecunianonolet
    pecunianonolet Posts: 2,023 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Ocelot said:
    I think it depends on how you are paying into your pension. If it is via salary sacrifice, the higher rate should be automatically applied, but not if you do it another way.
    I know, salary sacrifice is what I had at my previous company (they offered a choice of method) and it was far easier, even if I sacrificed the 1% on the lowest band in Scotland as it is taken to the exact rates vs the pension provider claiming 20% relief from HMRC so a very marginal gain of that 1% extra relief.

    Current employer doesn't offer a sacrifice option, even if it would be cheaper for them due to the lower NI payments they'd need to make and I am left with the extra work too. 

    Salary sacrifice is definitely the better solution imho.
  • Sorry to jump on this thread, but would someone be willing to double check my thinking please:

    Taxable pay (from P60)£49,530
    Interest income £13,690
    Employee pension contributions£5,500
    SIPP contributions. (gross)£19,500

    I think I'm right that it's Pay + Interest - EmpPen - SIPP = £38,220. 

    I think this still puts me just into the Higher Rate band, and I need to make another SIPP contribution of £520 to stay in the Basic Rate band and only be taxed at 20% above £1000 of savings interest rather than at 40% above £500.
  • Dazed_and_C0nfused
    Dazed_and_C0nfused Posts: 19,416 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 30 March 2024 at 11:36AM
    Sorry to jump on this thread, but would someone be willing to double check my thinking please:

    Taxable pay (from P60)£49,530
    Interest income £13,690
    Employee pension contributions£5,500
    SIPP contributions. (gross)£19,500

    I think I'm right that it's Pay + Interest - EmpPen - SIPP = £38,220. 

    I think this still puts me just into the Higher Rate band, and I need to make another SIPP contribution of £520 to stay in the Basic Rate band and only be taxed at 20% above £1000 of savings interest rather than at 40% above £500.
    What method was used for the employee pension contributions?

    Was it relief at source (same as the SIPP)?

    And if so was the £5,500 net or gross?

    Although you don't appear or be particularly close to the HR threshold on those figures.
  • Sorry to jump on this thread, but would someone be willing to double check my thinking please:

    Taxable pay (from P60)£49,530
    Interest income £13,690
    Employee pension contributions£5,500
    SIPP contributions. (gross)£19,500

    I think I'm right that it's Pay + Interest - EmpPen - SIPP = £38,220. 

    I think this still puts me just into the Higher Rate band, and I need to make another SIPP contribution of £520 to stay in the Basic Rate band and only be taxed at 20% above £1000 of savings interest rather than at 40% above £500.
    What method was used for the employee pension contributions?

    Was it relief at source (same as the SIPP)?

    And if so was the £5,500 net or gross?

    Although you don't appear or be particularly close to the HR threshold on those figures.
    Thanks for taking a look at this.

    My employee pension is a teacher's pension (DB).  The £5500 is from my year to date payslip (presume this is salary sacrifice?).

    Would you mind clarifying the figure I need to be under?  I'm not sure if Pay + Interest - EmpPen - SIPP need to be under £37,700 or £52,750.

    Sorry this is a stupid question, perhaps I'm worrying unnecessarily and I am no at all near the HR threshold.

    Thanks in advance. 
  • Dazed_and_C0nfused
    Dazed_and_C0nfused Posts: 19,416 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 30 March 2024 at 12:54PM
    Sorry to jump on this thread, but would someone be willing to double check my thinking please:

    Taxable pay (from P60)£49,530
    Interest income £13,690
    Employee pension contributions£5,500
    SIPP contributions. (gross)£19,500

    I think I'm right that it's Pay + Interest - EmpPen - SIPP = £38,220. 

    I think this still puts me just into the Higher Rate band, and I need to make another SIPP contribution of £520 to stay in the Basic Rate band and only be taxed at 20% above £1000 of savings interest rather than at 40% above £500.
    What method was used for the employee pension contributions?

    Was it relief at source (same as the SIPP)?

    And if so was the £5,500 net or gross?

    Although you don't appear or be particularly close to the HR threshold on those figures.
    Thanks for taking a look at this.

    My employee pension is a teacher's pension (DB).  The £5500 is from my year to date payslip (presume this is salary sacrifice?).

    Would you mind clarifying the figure I need to be under?  I'm not sure if Pay + Interest - EmpPen - SIPP need to be under £37,700 or £52,750.

    Sorry this is a stupid question, perhaps I'm worrying unnecessarily and I am no at all near the HR threshold.

    Thanks in advance. 
    You can never deduct salary sacrifice contributions as they are employer contributions.

    But I have never heard of TPS using salary sacrifice, as far as I'm aware they use the net pay method.  Which also cannot be deducted as they are already factored into your P60 pay amount. 

    And unless Scottish resident the higher rate threshold is £50,270.
  • qbadger
    qbadger Posts: 100 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Just want to double check something with someone - do you also find HMRC sometimes plays a bit fast and loose with terminology on their own website? 

    In the Tax Rates and Bands table of their guidance, they refer to "Income after allowances". My understanding is that what they actually mean here is, taxable income less Personal Allowance and less reliefs (expenses). Tax-free allowances such as PSA, dividend allowance, trading and property allowances are not to be included in this calculation to determine whether we are basic/higher/additional rate payer.
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rates-and-allowances-income-tax/income-tax-rates-and-allowances-current-and-past#tax-rates-and-bands
    Now I suppose HMRC would say we should be clever enough to know from the context that "after allowances" here is referring to just Personal Allowance, adjusted by Married Couple’s Allowance and Blind Person’s Allowance. But even 'allowing' for that, I don't think they are being precise enough as it ignores the tax reliefs.
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 41,010 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    qbadger said:
    Just want to double check something with someone - do you also find HMRC sometimes plays a bit fast and loose with terminology on their own website? 

    In the Tax Rates and Bands table of their guidance, they refer to "Income after allowances". My understanding is that what they actually mean here is, taxable income less Personal Allowance and less reliefs (expenses). Tax-free allowances such as PSA, dividend allowance, trading and property allowances are not to be included in this calculation to determine whether we are basic/higher/additional rate payer.
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rates-and-allowances-income-tax/income-tax-rates-and-allowances-current-and-past#tax-rates-and-bands
    Now I suppose HMRC would say we should be clever enough to know from the context that "after allowances" here is referring to just Personal Allowance, adjusted by Married Couple’s Allowance and Blind Person’s Allowance. But even 'allowing' for that, I don't think they are being precise enough as it ignores the tax reliefs.
    It's often commented on here that personal savings and dividend "allowances" aren't "tax-free allowances" as such at all, but are nil-rate bands applicable to taxable income, so yes, they're undoubtedly guilty of imprecise terminology.
  • spider42
    spider42 Posts: 137 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    qbadger said:
    My understanding is that what they actually mean here is, taxable income less Personal Allowance and less reliefs (expenses). Tax-free allowances such as PSA, dividend allowance, trading and property allowances are not to be included in this calculation to determine whether we are basic/higher/additional rate payer.
    Not quite. PSA and dividend allowance are nil rate of tax, and don't reduce taxable income. But the trading and property allowances don't work in the same way and do reduce taxable income.
  • qbadger said:
    Just want to double check something with someone - do you also find HMRC sometimes plays a bit fast and loose with terminology on their own website? 

    In the Tax Rates and Bands table of their guidance, they refer to "Income after allowances". My understanding is that what they actually mean here is, taxable income less Personal Allowance and less reliefs (expenses). Tax-free allowances such as PSA, dividend allowance, trading and property allowances are not to be included in this calculation to determine whether we are basic/higher/additional rate payer.
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rates-and-allowances-income-tax/income-tax-rates-and-allowances-current-and-past#tax-rates-and-bands
    Now I suppose HMRC would say we should be clever enough to know from the context that "after allowances" here is referring to just Personal Allowance, adjusted by Married Couple’s Allowance and Blind Person’s Allowance. But even 'allowing' for that, I don't think they are being precise enough as it ignores the tax reliefs.
    Married Couple's Allowance (or Marriage Allowance for the recipient) is not an allowance in the normal sense.

    They provide a tax credit which is offset against someone's tax liability.
  • qbadger
    qbadger Posts: 100 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks everyone for the useful information. I'll leave my original post unedited so that others may learn from my mistakes.

    It seems then when coming across the term "allowance" on HMRC's website, the safest thing is to do is to treat it with suspicion... sometimes it means a nil rate tax band (PSA, dividend allowance), sometimes it is a deductible relief (trading allowance, property allowance), and other times it means a tax credit/reduction (marriage allowance). Of course, sometimes it actually really is an allowance (personal allowance, blind person's allowance)!

    I do however have some sympathy for them as the source legislation looks complicated, so it's probably not easy to simplify and translate that into layman's terms.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.