📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Low cost global ETF

Options
124»

Comments

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,329 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    TBC15 said:
    cloud_dog said:
    TBC15 said:
    cloud_dog said:
    Just compared it against HMWO (just out of interest) and the fund is up 0.5% over a 5 year period, with some of that time outperforming my reference fund and some of the time under performing my reference fund.

    I only post as a comment, as I was a little intrigued by the fund.

    A quick eye ball on HL gives me XDEM ahead of HMWO over 1,3,5 and 10years by 10%,7%,20% and 100% approx.


    Mine was just a very quick comparison, and I simply chucked the two funds into the FT.com 'compare' function.

    Interesting.

    I don’t have access to FT.com, so I went over to Morningstar and ran a comparison. Some of the results were markedly different from what HLs graphs would suggest. HL 1,3,5 and 10 yrs 10%,7%.20% and 100% ish. Morningstar 1,3,5 and 10 yrs  9.5%,2%,4% and 55%.

    I must admit I’m surprised, whose free information can you trust?

    I always use Trustnet if I can. With those sort of differences, is it just that Morningstar is not set to include reinvested income?
  • TBC15
    TBC15 Posts: 1,496 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    masonic said:
    TBC15 said:
    cloud_dog said:
    TBC15 said:
    cloud_dog said:
    Just compared it against HMWO (just out of interest) and the fund is up 0.5% over a 5 year period, with some of that time outperforming my reference fund and some of the time under performing my reference fund.

    I only post as a comment, as I was a little intrigued by the fund.

    A quick eye ball on HL gives me XDEM ahead of HMWO over 1,3,5 and 10years by 10%,7%,20% and 100% approx.


    Mine was just a very quick comparison, and I simply chucked the two funds into the FT.com 'compare' function.

    Interesting.

    I don’t have access to FT.com, so I went over to Morningstar and ran a comparison. Some of the results were markedly different from what HLs graphs would suggest. HL 1,3,5 and 10 yrs 10%,7%.20% and 100% ish. Morningstar 1,3,5 and 10 yrs  9.5%,2%,4% and 55%.

    I must admit I’m surprised, whose free information can you trust?

    I always use Trustnet if I can. With those sort of differences, is it just that Morningstar is not set to include reinvested income?

    Thanks for that you have hit the nail on the head. The difference was down to income reinvestment with HMWO. Painfully obvious when you use Trustnet.


Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.