SiP Parking Charge ANPR

clowncake

As the keeper I have received your usual threatening ANPR parking charge from SiP for being "parked in a manner other than in accordance with the signage situated at the car park".

After looking closely at the letter the "entry" image that they have provided me with barely even shows a number plate, nevermind something that you can clearly make out and read.

I have sent them the appeal template from the newbies thread which stated that I wanted images of the vehicle but they have obviously rejected it and didnt provide me with anything that I asked for in the appeal. 

As the keeper, what should I do next?

KeithP

clowncake said:

As the keeper, what should I do next?

Wait for the next step.
Prepare yourself for what happens next by reading more of the NEWBIES thread.

Coupon-mad

Same advice as this IPC firm:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80550968/#Comment_80550968

Now, in that case you can see the unexpected outcome but it doesn't change my advice.

clowncake

Would that be waiting for court or appealing with ISA? I see that there are mixed opinions about appealing to ISA since its not POPLA. 

Also, this was a vehicle that the keeper borrowed to someone for a music video. Would it be better for me to redirect the letter back to the "driver"?

Coupon-mad

I assume we cross-posted as the link explains our view.  The person who defends the case should be the strongest personality, ideally, who won't be fazed by a court claim.

clowncake

Coupon-mad said:

I assume we cross-posted as the link explains our view.  The person who defends the case should be the strongest personality, ideally, who won't be fazed by a court claim.

Okay I see, and what if the driver provides me with information to a person that might not exist.  

KeithP

clowncake said:

Coupon-mad said:

I assume we cross-posted as the link explains our view.  The person who defends the case should be the strongest personality, ideally, who won't be fazed by a court claim.

Okay I see, and what if the driver provides me with information to a person that might not exist.  

I don't understand that question.
Are you saying that you don't know who the driver was at the time?

clowncake

KeithP said:

clowncake said:

Coupon-mad said:

I assume we cross-posted as the link explains our view.  The person who defends the case should be the strongest personality, ideally, who won't be fazed by a court claim.

Okay I see, and what if the driver provides me with information to a person that might not exist.  

I don't understand that question.
Are you saying that you don't know who the driver was at the time?

I don't know the driver officially, in a government name basis and address type of way. 

KeithP

It appears that you lent your vehicle to someone. Do you know who you lent it to?

What has the government got to do with it?

clowncake

I know the driver, just not their official details. So im wondering what could happen if they gave me false information. 

fisherjim

clowncake said:

I know the driver, just not their official details. So im wondering what could happen if they gave me false information. 

You seem to have chosen an apt forum name!