We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
"New" income product for retirement?

LHW99
Posts: 5,113 Forumite


I read this article:
Having done so, my thoughts are:
"Market portfolio" - Equity based one assumes, perhaps with a sprinkling of bonds.
"Guaranteed income-producing asset" - I presume an annuity of some kind?
So is this actually a new solution, or is it a clever marketing of an existing option, which people here already consider?
It does seem to me that if you employ an IFA, they would be able to put together something similar without using some specific product to do so.
Is it likely to charge increased fees? - my thought is probably so, other wise why invent what they call a "blended solution" (https://www.justadviser.com/products/guaranteed-income-solutions/).
I'd be interested in the forum's thoughts.
0
Comments
-
It is service just for financial advisors, not something you can buy off the shelf.
AIUI advisors often use these types of services, rather than trying to design bespoke portfolios from scratch themselves.0 -
https://www.pensionsage.com/pa/Standard-Life-and-Fidelity-partner-up-to-launch-new-smoothed-fund.php
Theoretically a similar product or idea 🤷♂️1 -
Albermarle said:It is service just for financial advisors, not something you can buy off the shelf.
AIUI advisors often use these types of services, rather than trying to design bespoke portfolios from scratch themselves.
Which does suggest to me that it is more marketing than anything very new, as similar things (presumably) have been available to advisors for some time.
0 -
ewaste said:https://www.pensionsage.com/pa/Standard-Life-and-Fidelity-partner-up-to-launch-new-smoothed-fund.php
Theoretically a similar product or idea 🤷♂️
The one LHW99 is referring to is an MPS with an annuity within the platform. Something several platforms offer (in connection with the MPS of the adviser's choice). I was in a meeting with a different software supplier that modelled the use of annuity in place of gilts and bonds and showed outcomes. (i.e. your portfolio was higher in equities as the bond/gilts side was reduced). They also modelled buying the annuity younger and locking in current rates whilst not having the annuity income paid out but retained in the pension wrapper to avoid tax and reinvested to buy units.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.2 -
dunstonh said:ewaste said:https://www.pensionsage.com/pa/Standard-Life-and-Fidelity-partner-up-to-launch-new-smoothed-fund.php
Theoretically a similar product or idea 🤷♂️
The one LHW99 is referring to is an MPS with an annuity within the platform. Something several platforms offer (in connection with the MPS of the adviser's choice). I was in a meeting with a different software supplier that modelled the use of annuity in place of gilts and bonds and showed outcomes. (i.e. your portfolio was higher in equities as the bond/gilts side was reduced). They also modelled buying the annuity younger and locking in current rates whilst not having the annuity income paid out but retained in the pension wrapper to avoid tax and reinvested to buy units.
What is MPS?0 -
What is MPS?Managed Portfolio Service. Basically, a portfolio of funds either run within a fund (like the VLS60 fund) or a portfolio of funds working a similar way but using software on the platform (like the VLS60 MPS - which DIY investors don't get access to).
Going back to the Standard Life/Fidelity match-up, I wonder if it is because Fidelity has seen just how much money has ended up going to Pru with its Prufunds (which operate on a smooth basis). Fidelity, despite being one of the oldest platforms, is also the largest loss maker. It's market share has also fallen from 15.5% in 2018 to 11.8% in 2022. If you are losing market share and making the greatest losses, then you need to innovate or copy to turn it around.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
dunstonh said:What is MPS?Managed Portfolio Service. Basically, a portfolio of funds either run within a fund (like the VLS60 fund) or a portfolio of funds working a similar way but using software on the platform (like the VLS60 MPS - which DIY investors don't get access to).
Going back to the Standard Life/Fidelity match-up, I wonder if it is because Fidelity has seen just how much money has ended up going to Pru with its Prufunds (which operate on a smooth basis). Fidelity, despite being one of the oldest platforms, is also the largest loss maker. Its market share has also fallen from 15.5% in 2018 to 11.8% in 2022. If you are losing market share and making the greatest losses, then you need to innovate or copy to turn it around.
I annuitised about 70% of my drawdown pot with the remainder going into global ETFs like HMWO and VWRL.
The JL RPI annuity plus two small DBs guarantees retirement and the drawdown pot (plus any contributions made until June) will probably just get state pension amount removals (capped to stay below 40% tax limit) from my forthcoming retirement in June until the actual state pension kicks in (7 years).
We have more than enough even without this drawdown pot - (the lovely) @Sea_Shell doubled pretty much.
I think that was a reasonable sleep at night choice for me anyway.0 -
Fidelity, despite being one of the oldest platforms, is also the largest loss maker. It's market share has also fallen from 15.5% in 2018 to 11.8% in 2022.
Presume that is on the Fidelity advised side ?
The retail platform doubled its customer base when they bought the L& G personal investing business a couple of years ago. Although it only increased their AUM by about 30%
0 -
Albermarle said:Fidelity, despite being one of the oldest platforms, is also the largest loss maker. It's market share has also fallen from 15.5% in 2018 to 11.8% in 2022.
Presume that is on the Fidelity advised side ?
The retail platform doubled its customer base when they bought the L& G personal investing business a couple of years ago. Although it only increased their AUM by about 30%
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
This just sounds like a wrapper provided by a middleman that I'm sure will come with fees. I'll bet that these fees will be at the back of any literature in small print...maybe guarded by a leopard...and won't be insignificant.
The DIYer can do the same by setting up an appropriate asset allocation including guaranteed products like saving accounts, bond ladders held to maturity, SP, DB pensions and annuities.And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 242.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards