We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Multiple 0% balance transfer cards


We have some debt on credit cards and are looking to move to a/some balance transfer cards but have a couple of questions:
If we continuously apply for/move balances, does this negatively affect our credit rating?
Would it be advised to use multiple balance transfer cards if we are only offered lower credit limits than the amount we wish to move from previous cards, in order to have the whole or as much of the balance as possible on 0% transfer cards?
Hope all of this makes sense

Thank you very much
Comments
-
The searches and accounts will appear on one or more of your files. Lenders will draw their own conclusions. You have no independent 'credit rating'. The main priority is to ensure that your debt goes down and not up.
Accept any cards you are offered and move what you can1 -
Making lots of credit card applications in a short amount of time can give a bad impression. It might be worth trying to see which are most likely to accept you with the highest amount of credit per card (I think the MSE eligibility checker has a field for this)1
-
Making lots of applications will result in your credit score dropping. Thankfully, the score you see on your credit report is utterly meaningless, and can safely be ignored.But lots of searches in a short space of time can be a bad thing - bluntly put, it makes you appear as if you're desperate for credit.As MorningCoffee says, each hard search will be visible to any lender who views your credit file. What each lender will make of it is anyone's guess - each lender will have their own, different, lending criteria. These criteria are confidential and commercially sensitive, so you'll never know what they are.But the general consensus is that a couple of searches in a short space of time is OK, more than that and lenders start to get a bit jittery.So yes, do a few eligibility checks first, make a couple of applications to the ones that you've got a decent chance of being accepted for, and just shift what you can.0
-
If by "we" you mean a couple with debts in your own names, then it's generally safe to do 2 applications each in close proximity, after that it's not a good idea as it sets off warning flags that something is wrong or you're desperate or about to run up a load of debt and run with it. After that wait around 3-6 months.
I'd accept anything you get given lenders will look both at your income and your existing debt plus possible future debt (as you could use the credit cards for spending not transfers) and make the decision.
No harm in using a checker like the MSE one and see what they suggest but I would then do a proper check on the bank website preferably one with a soft search - most do this I believe - before applying, no use MSE telling you you're 100% pre-approved for something, doing a hard search and the bank saying nopeSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
MorningcoffeeIV said:The searches and accounts will appear on one or more of your files. Lenders will draw their own conclusions. You have no independent 'credit rating'. The main priority is to ensure that your debt goes down and not up.
Accept any cards you are offered and move what you can0 -
Thank you all very much for helping with this; am sure will have more questions in the future!
This really is a great resource, very happy to have signed up0 -
Superhoopza said:MorningcoffeeIV said:The searches and accounts will appear on one or more of your files. Lenders will draw their own conclusions. You have no independent 'credit rating'. The main priority is to ensure that your debt goes down and not up.
Accept any cards you are offered and move what you canSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
Nasqueron said:Superhoopza said:MorningcoffeeIV said:The searches and accounts will appear on one or more of your files. Lenders will draw their own conclusions. You have no independent 'credit rating'. The main priority is to ensure that your debt goes down and not up.
Accept any cards you are offered and move what you can0 -
daivid said:Nasqueron said:Superhoopza said:MorningcoffeeIV said:The searches and accounts will appear on one or more of your files. Lenders will draw their own conclusions. You have no independent 'credit rating'. The main priority is to ensure that your debt goes down and not up.
Accept any cards you are offered and move what you can
If we're talking £1500+ and over 12 months, then we start to see a significant impact on having the card, even if it is for a limit lower than needed. Just wanted to clarify that for the OP and other readers.
I'm finding more providers are starting to tell you your limit during soft searches now, but not all. It's an encouraging practice.
0 -
Superhoopza said:daivid said:Nasqueron said:Superhoopza said:MorningcoffeeIV said:The searches and accounts will appear on one or more of your files. Lenders will draw their own conclusions. You have no independent 'credit rating'. The main priority is to ensure that your debt goes down and not up.
Accept any cards you are offered and move what you can
If we're talking £1500+ and over 12 months, then we start to see a significant impact on having the card, even if it is for a limit lower than needed. Just wanted to clarify that for the OP and other readers.
I'm finding more providers are starting to tell you your limit during soft searches now, but not all. It's an encouraging practice.Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards