We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
HMRC Investigation time limit
Options
Comments
-
Dazed_and_C0nfused said:chutney51 said:Hoeing, Did you read my post?
"You had no qualms about keeping quiet about the underpayment of tax though. How did it arise? Must be pretty apparent."
She declared ALL income back in 2022 by her self assess form. She received a letter saying all good, here's an £18 refund. She didn't know there was an underpayment. She paid tax on the normal pension and tax on the SIPP money. At no point did she know there was an underpayment until January this year.
HMRC knew about her income from her tax return AND the info from the SIPP provider.
Why do you make assumptions like that?
Did she claim some relief she wasn't entitled to?
Something doesn't make sense here as £12,000 is a significant amount to owe from a HMRC enquiry (if it does turn out to be owed).0 -
Sounds like she may have completed the self assessment incorrectly. And now HMRC have looked in to it they have discovered the mistake(s).0
-
Thanks Dazed. You ask:
"So if she declared all income what is it you think can mean HMRC believe there is extra tax to pay?"
It appears the SIPP provider charged tax at 20% on the £83k. It was in 3 different payments with 3 different tax codes. (Bearing in mind her normal pension was already paying 20% and using up her tax allowance for the year.) Obviously she was now into the 40% bracket, hence the extra tax that should have been paid now being chased by HMRC. She did pay about £17k in tax for the SIPP money. To her, having been PAYE and low tax bracket for 35 years, that was an enormous amount of tax.
"Did she claim some relief she wasn't entitled to?"
No. She had 2 incomes for the year - her regular pension and the SIPP withdrawal (taxed by the SIPP provider). Also about £20 in interest from a bank account. Remember interest was virtually zero from banks at the time.
The point I keep needing to stress is that HMRC had all this info back in 2022 from her self assess form. Nothing has changed. They are suggesting they have new info, but its the same numbers.0 -
chutney51 said:Thanks Dazed. You ask:
"So if she declared all income what is it you think can mean HMRC believe there is extra tax to pay?"
It appears the SIPP provider charged tax at 20% on the £83k. It was in 3 different payments with 3 different tax codes. (Bearing in mind her normal pension was already paying 20% and using up her tax allowance for the year.) Obviously she was now into the 40% bracket, hence the extra tax that should have been paid now being chased by HMRC. She did pay about £17k in tax for the SIPP money. To her, having been PAYE and low tax bracket for 35 years, that was an enormous amount of tax.
"Did she claim some relief she wasn't entitled to?"
No. She had 2 incomes for the year - her regular pension and the SIPP withdrawal (taxed by the SIPP provider). Also about £20 in interest from a bank account. Remember interest was virtually zero from banks at the time.
The point I keep needing to stress is that HMRC had all this info back in 2022 from her self assess form. Nothing has changed. They are suggesting they have new info, but its the same numbers.
Sorry but that simply doesn't make sense.
A Self Assessment return is for her to declare all her taxable income so if she did that then her Self Assessment calculation would show the correct tax liability.
It really does seem like you are missing some key information here or are being selective with what you are telling us.1 -
chutney51 said:Thanks Dazed. You ask:
"So if she declared all income what is it you think can mean HMRC believe there is extra tax to pay?"
It appears the SIPP provider charged tax at 20% on the £83k. It was in 3 different payments with 3 different tax codes. (Bearing in mind her normal pension was already paying 20% and using up her tax allowance for the year.) Obviously she was now into the 40% bracket, hence the extra tax that should have been paid now being chased by HMRC. She did pay about £17k in tax for the SIPP money. To her, having been PAYE and low tax bracket for 35 years, that was an enormous amount of tax.
"Did she claim some relief she wasn't entitled to?"
No. She had 2 incomes for the year - her regular pension and the SIPP withdrawal (taxed by the SIPP provider). Also about £20 in interest from a bank account. Remember interest was virtually zero from banks at the time.
The point I keep needing to stress is that HMRC had all this info back in 2022 from her self assess form. Nothing has changed. They are suggesting they have new info, but it’s the same numbers.0 -
Again, she put down ALL her income on the SA form in 2022. I watched her do it. The income from her normal pension, the extra income from her SIPP being cashed in, and even a couple of quid interest from bank accounts.
My beef with HMRC is they say they have new information. They dont.
I wish we had done it on paper and photocopied it, or taken screenshots. Live and learn.0 -
chutney51 said:Again, she put down ALL her income on the SA form in 2022. I watched her do it. The income from her normal pension, the extra income from her SIPP being cashed in, and even a couple of quid interest from bank accounts.chutney51 said:My beef with HMRC is they say they have new information. They dont.chutney51 said:I wish we had done it on paper and photocopied it, or taken screenshots. Live and learn.0
-
If all personal allowances were utilised at the regular pension, and an entry was made showing only 20% tax deduction on an £83k taxable SIPP withdrawal, the calculation would not have shown a refund of £18, rather a sizeable underpayment.I really don’t understand the acceptance of the £18 refund while knowing that further tax was due.What exactly was entered on the return relevant to the SIPP?0
-
[Deleted User] said:If all personal allowances were utilised at the regular pension, and an entry was made showing only 20% tax deduction on an £83k taxable SIPP withdrawal, the calculation would not have shown a refund of £18, rather a sizeable underpayment.I really don’t understand the acceptance of the £18 refund while knowing that further tax was due.What exactly was entered on the return relevant to the SIPP?
The op has either misunderstood what the Self in Self Assessment refers to or has been hoping to get away with something and it's come back to bite them.
Or there is something they are failing to get across in the posts they have previously made.0 -
chutney51 said:Again, she put down ALL her income on the SA form in 2022. I watched her do it. The income from her normal pension, the extra income from her SIPP being cashed in, and even a couple of quid interest from bank accounts.
My beef with HMRC is they say they have new information. They dont.
I wish we had done it on paper and photocopied it, or taken screenshots. Live and learn.
As mentioned above by someone else, if she submitted it online she can access the completed self assessments for the last few years through her online tax account.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards