📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

First marriage, legal entitlement?

2»

Comments

  • Exodi
    Exodi Posts: 4,006 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Wedding Day Wonder Name Dropper
    Savvy_Sue said:
    Plus, if you were successful in getting that money now (and it doesn't sound very likely), then it would become part of your assets. That might make divorce look like an attractive option to your current separated husband. 

    It may be worth considering finalising the separation in divorce while there's not much to argue about? 
    Indeed, history is bound to repeat itself.

    The grandchildren will likely be more upset that whatever amount of money granny can leave them without litigating 40+ year old events, could potentially be hoisted out of their hands by the estranged second husband.

    Even if there is a will in place excluding him (and the circumstances may suggest there isn't), it may be contested on the grounds that it does not make adequate provision for the spouse.  Even though you have the right to exclude anyone in your will (e.g. specifically stating them in an exclusion clause), the Inheritance Act also allows individuals (typically spouses and dependent children) to claim against estates on the grounds they have not been left reasonable financial provision.
    Know what you don't
  • WYSPECIAL
    WYSPECIAL Posts: 746 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Was there a clean break/consent order or any form of financial order with your first divorce?
    Doesn't matter as she has remarried.
    Depending on who the applicant was and what boxes were ticked on the forms remarriage might not prevent making a claim.
  • AskAsk
    AskAsk Posts: 3,048 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    financial claims stop when either party remarries so unless there were acceptable reasons why you did not make a claim for financial split, it is too late.
  • WYSPECIAL
    WYSPECIAL Posts: 746 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    AskAsk said:
    financial claims stop when either party remarries so unless there were acceptable reasons why you did not make a claim for financial split, it is too late.
    The OP may have been the applicant in the divorce. They may not have been barred by remarriage although the delay will need some explanation.
  • VyEu
    VyEu Posts: 104 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary
    You remarried. If there was no financial remedy order in place at the time then the only application open to you is potentially a pension sharing order. If your ex however has not remarried then he can bring a claim against you (for all financial remedies)
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.