We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Auction - Limited Title Guarantee

I am looking at an auction property being sold with limited title guarantee. I am trying to work out why it has a limited title guarantee. I have viewed the property twice and nothing stands out. I am quite confident that services don't run across neighboring land and extensions havn't been built on the house. The property is freehold. It does have a charge against it by the mortgage company and the property is owned by a limited company. Could they be reasons its being sold with a limited title guarentee?

Could the condition below mean the property is sold with a limited title guarentee?

"not to refuse to complete the purchase of the Property on the basis of a financial charge and / or unilateral notice and / or restriction and / or any adverse entry whatsover subsisting over the Property (the “Adverse Entry”) where the Seller’s solicitors have been provided with an undertaking to remove the Adverse Entry by a firm of solicitors regulated by the SRA, a firm or company regulated by the Council for Licensed Conveyancers or by in-house Council. The Seller’s solicitors will at the Buyers reasonable request and sole cost use reasonable endeavours to enforce that undertaking to remove the said Adverse Entry from the title. This clause will take effect in the same way where the Seller is the registered proprietor of the Property but nonetheless the Adverse Entry remains on the title to the Property and the Seller has received an undertaking for its removal."

Thank you

 


Comments

  • anselld
    anselld Posts: 8,733 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It is usually just that the person selling does not have the knowledge of the property history in order to give full title guarantee, for example because they are executors for a deceased estate.
  • Thank you. This is not the sale of a deceased estate so I was thinking what else could be the reason behind the limited title guarantee. 
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 19,446 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Hopefully you're getting legal advice generally before you bid anyway?
  • When your solicitor reviews the sales pack he/she will advise you. This, of course, is before you bid.
  • FreeBear
    FreeBear Posts: 18,330 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    duff_man said: This is not the sale of a deceased estate so I was thinking what else could be the reason behind the limited title guarantee. 
    Limited title guarantee means that the vendor can not guarantee that there are no charges or third party interests in the property, or if there are any covenants lurking in the background. You say that this property is owned by a company - Possibly a repossession or part-ex where they do not have the full history. 


    Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
    Erik Aronesty, 2014

    Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.