We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Inheriting Half a House on Death of First Parent

13»

Comments

  • RHemmings
    RHemmings Posts: 4,894 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    GunJack said:
    doodling said:
    Hi,
    GunJack said:
     If you put half that house from your parents in your name then you will likely have to pay stamp duty plus the additional 4% on that share.
    I thought that might be the case, I think their will is currently written to pass the half directly to me which could well make us liable.
    That would be unusual - most people don't want their children to be able to throw their widow out of the house in that situation.
    me throwing one of them out would never even be a possibility, we're quite a close family :)...
    Probably still better for there to be a formal agreement/situation in writing. 
  • HampshireH
    HampshireH Posts: 5,004 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There's another potential catch.

    If the local authority believe they gave away an asset (eg 50% of a property) in order to qualify for means tested care costs they could deem it to be 'Deprivation of Assets' and include the valuen that was given away when assessing their assets/eligibility.

    If not, everyone going into care would just give their property away and make the tax payer liable!

    It's a bit more complicated than that but you can see there are many things to consider......
    But the OP parents haven't given away anything in life. It's on death the half a property would be inherited so they would be beyond the need for care.

    How is that a deprivation of assets? The owners if each own 50% are entitled to pass that on to who they choose in death. 
  • GunJack
    GunJack Posts: 11,932 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    On the deprivation of assets - I believe they own as Tenants In Common, so can pass on individually.RHemmings said:

    Probably still better for there to be a formal agreement/situation in writing. 
    Absolutely...there is one now, they just want to revisit/refresh as it's been 20-odd years since the original was done.
    ......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......

    I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple :D
  • jennifernil
    jennifernil Posts: 5,783 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Leaving what you own to someone in your will is not deprivation of assets.

    If you own a property with your spouse in such a way as to enable you to leave your part to your children, with your spouse entitled to remain in it for as long as they wish, doing so will not be deprivation of assets, or  mean that  children will be liable for LTT or CGT on the 
    property.  Take good legal advice on the correct way to do this.
  • GunJack
    GunJack Posts: 11,932 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Leaving what you own to someone in your will is not deprivation of assets.

    If you own a property with your spouse in such a way as to enable you to leave your part to your children, with your spouse entitled to remain in it for as long as they wish, doing so will not be deprivation of assets, or  mean that  children will be liable for LTT or CGT on the property.
     good legal advice on the correct way to do this.
    they are.....this is all research prior to them going back to the solicitors.
    ......Gettin' There, Wherever There is......

    I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple :D
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.