We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Contents Insurance Question

eliza2811
eliza2811 Posts: 178 Forumite
Ninth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
edited 8 January 2024 at 8:47PM in Insurance & life assurance
Hi,

I am just about to renew my contents insurance policy and came across the question: is the house in a good state of repair ?

I should explain that I am a tenant, the landlord is private, the house is over 100 yrs old and I've lived in the house since 2001. 

In the last year, we've had water come through the brickwork in the front room at ceiling level ruining the plasterwork/wall/coving. This is now sorted.  Water coming through the brickwork in my daughters bedroom causing the wallpaper to peel off and go black (mold?).  These issues will be sorted, I'm assured, from outside and inside by the landlord's builder when the weather gets better.

We've always damp in the kitchen and dining room but its drys out in summer.  The DPC was done years ago by the way in the kitchen and dining room areas.  Its mainly the chimney breast walls and an external wall.

None of these issues have ever caused us to claim on contents insurance. Its not MY house, so should i declare or not that the property is in a good state of repair. If I put its not in a good state of repair, I'm getting insane premiums for 3 different companies that i've never heard of!  Surely damp, etc is part of buildings cover ?

Any advice please ?  We've never had flood issues and aren't near any water thank goodness :-)

Comments

  • Alderbank
    Alderbank Posts: 4,320 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Damp which affects the fabric of the building (walls, timbers, etc.) is part of buildings cover.

    Damp which affects your clothes, books, etc. is part of contents cover.

    Insurance is predicated on honesty and acting in good faith. Your possessions are at much greater risk in a building that might collapse or the roof cave in than in a well maintained building. It's not a question of whose fault it is.
    If the premiums are insane it is because the risk is high.
  • Mark_d
    Mark_d Posts: 2,748 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    With water coming through, mould and damp in the kitchen/dining room it sounds like the house is not in a good state of repair.  If your front door was crumbling, can you see how things like this would put your contents at risk?
    Ultimately if you don't answer the insurer's questions accurately then it might be considered fraud.  Maybe you'll be paying insurance premiums only for your claim to be denied if/when you do make a claim.
  • amanda1024
    amanda1024 Posts: 433 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    One thing you could do is ‘self-insure’ while you wait for the specific issues to be sorted, then you can go back to honestly saying the building is in a good state of repair and get standard contents insurance. I don’t know if the landlord has any liability if they’re aware of the issues but choosing to delay fixing them.
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 18,613 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    One thing you could do is ‘self-insure’ while you wait for the specific issues to be sorted, then you can go back to honestly saying the building is in a good state of repair and get standard contents insurance. 
    Self insuring for Contents for the average household would mean putting £40,000 aside to cover your home burning down @amanda1024 and you being left with only the clothes on your back, I'm not sure the average person has that sort of excess cash to self insure.

    It sounds like maybe you mean risk being uninsured for a period? There is a big difference between uninsured and self-insured, the later means you have the finances put aside explicitly to cover (large) claims
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.