We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Help to understand CUE motor claim data access request
rob_cb
Posts: 17 Forumite
I had a non-fault car accident a couple of years ago (someone ran into the back of me at traffic lights). Last month, I switched insurers and their validation team said it was registered as "at fault" with CUE (Claims & Underwriting Exchange) and I need to contact the original insurer if I want it corrected. The new insurer accepted it was non-fault with additional documentation so I just want to ensure it's corrected on CUE.
I contacted my previous insurer about this and they say it's "non-fault" on CUE. I also just received the response to my subject access request from CUE but I
can't see anywhere that says if it was "at fault" or "non-fault". All I can see is Claim Status = Closed Settled.
Screenshot attached (censored personal information). Does this look like a "non-fault" claim or have they not shared this information with me?

0
Comments
-
Its the NCD indicator... you were allowed to keep your NCD and therefore its non-fault1
-
DullGreyGuy said:Its the NCD indicator... you were allowed to keep your NCD and therefore its non-fault
Thank you! Not obvious at all.
0 -
Have worked in insurance for 20 years and talked about CUE many times but never actually seen what they send in response to a SAR but fundamentally fault/non-fault is proxied by if the NCD is allowed or not.rob_cb said:DullGreyGuy said:Its the NCD indicator... you were allowed to keep your NCD and therefore its non-fault
Thank you! Not obvious at all.
Strictly fault is defined by if an insurer recovers their outlay or not but you get cases where an insured's £50,000 car is written off, the third party insurer reimburses us for that but states they consider the £100 engineer's inspection fee was unnecessary and so only reimburse £40 for a desktop assessment. Technically the insurer is £60 out of pocket still so would be a fault claim but in reality they are going to allow the NCD to stand as its clearly not worth litigation over £601
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards