We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Section 21 eviction notice
Comments
-
Only if a ground 1 notice was served at the commencement of the tenancydoodling said:
Can I just check that it is actually a S21 that has been issued and not something under S8? Repossession under section 8 (ground 1) could be used if the landlord is moving back in and you were notified at the start of the tenancy that the landlord might want to do that - in that case the validity of a S21 might not be a relevant point.0 -
The prescribed information was not included in the section 21 and in fact we have never received the prescribed information since moving inanselld said:The Council are not saying it looks invalid. They are asking you to check if you have received the necessary documents. So have you checked if your deposit is protected and when, and did you receive the prescribed information?It seems unlikely that everything would be correct *except* the deposit, but it is by no means impossible. You need to check.
I will point out though that i do know that the deposit is protected through DPS and the only way i know this is because when we moved in we received a DPS tenants guide leaflet included with our tenancy agreement
So i knew from this that most likely that's who they have used for the deposit and luckily i happened to already have an account with the DPS as that is who our previous landlord used, so i was able to see the deposit for our current property and yes they have added it into the DPS scheme on the date we moved in
So to confirm - deposit has been protected but we didn't receive prescribed information in section 21 or with all documentation when moving in
Surely this makes the section 21 not valid and the landlord has refused to give us more time to look past the deadline of march so we may wait until march deadline and then inform the estate agents that the section 21 isn't valid so that would then add another 2 months as they would need to issue another section 210 -
If you are 100% sure, then yes, it does make it invalid. However, March remains a decent timescale and it is difficult to see how another two months is going to improve your search options significantly. The notice will be got right at some point and you will need to face up to that.Houndog6105 said:anselld said:The Council are not saying it looks invalid. They are asking you to check if you have received the necessary documents. So have you checked if your deposit is protected and when, and did you receive the prescribed information?It seems unlikely that everything would be correct *except* the deposit, but it is by no means impossible. You need to check.
Surely this makes the section 21 not valid and the landlord has refused to give us more time to look past the deadline of march so we may wait until march deadline and then inform the estate agents that the section 21 isn't valid so that would then add another 2 months as they would need to issue another section 21
0 -
There is no requirement to include the Prescribed Information with the S21 Notice.the only way i know this is because when we moved in we received a DPS tenants guide leaflet included with our tenancy agreementAre you sure that did not include the PI?
0 -
I agree with @propertyrental - the fact you received the DPS tenants guide implies you were indeed provided with information letting you know your deposit had been protected, so it sounds to me like the S21 is fine.
Again, this may be your home, but the house belongs to someone else and they want it back. Annoying, but that's the downside of renting.
How is the search going for somewhere else? Have you asked your LL if he knows of anywhere else to rent? Are there any AirBnBs in the area where you could negotiate a 6 month let to find you more time to find somewhere else?
Looking for reasons the S21 isn't valid is a bit of a red herring, because ultimately you are going to have to move, so you need to focus your energy on finding another home.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
It depends what exactly was given. The prescribed information, as the name suggests, is explicitly set down in the legislation and if all the information required by law was not given then the s21 is not valid. The link to the prescribed information has been given by propertyrental so the OP can check exactly what they were given .vs. the legal requirement. We are just guessing until the OP confirms.pinkshoes said:the fact you received the DPS tenants guide implies you were indeed provided with information letting you know your deposit had been protected
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
