We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Being forced to use a Financial Advisor to transfer pension to pension.
Comments
-
Pat38493 said:scoobyjones1 said:QrizB said:scoobyjones1 said:Her thoughts are that she is desperate to have control over the full CETV immediately, £60k inside her already successful and easy to manage SIPP, rather than receive 2k a year, thanks for asking. I am beginning to think it's not worth the stress, time and expense. It may not even prove to be possible. However, it's her money and her account. I am not telling her what to do!The commonly-quoted UK SWR is 3.5%, so £60k in drawdown would yield you £2100 a year, which is on a par with the DB payout.scoobyjones1 said:... tech stocks have risen to the tune of 90-150% this year ...
Company and ticker symbol Performance in 2023NVIDIA (NVDA) 220.0%Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 111.5%Salesforce (CRM) 90.0%Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) 87.1%Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) 81.7%Adobe (ADBE) 81.6%Arista Networks (ANET) 81.1%ServiceNow (NOW) 76.6%LAM Research (LRCX) 70.3%Synopsys (SNPS) 70.2%Data as of Nov. 30, 2023
And the DB pension may offer up to 5% growth...may be less, capped and linked to CPI...which in her case would be about another £100 a year...or £8.33 a month...
Also, we could probably post a list of individual stocks that had stellar growth up until 2022, and then tanked in 2023 - investing in individual stocks is not something that most pension investors would do as they can be very volatile. Tech stocks in particular, as mentioned by DunstonH, have had a few huge crashes in the past where they lost more than 50% in a short period.
This thread is getting too diverse now. I may start it again with more specifics. Seems we are stuck with 3 options, take the 2.3k a year, take a 12k pot with 2k a year....or thirdly...possible expensive heart attack for nothing scenario!0 -
Seems we are stuck with 3 options, take the 2.3k a year, take a 12k pot with 2k a year....or thirdly...possible expensive heart attack for nothing scenario!
Is there a third (fourth?) option of taking say £1k pa and a larger lump sum? Not as large as the CETV, but larger than otherwise.1 -
take the 2.3k a year, take a 12k pot with 2k a year....
The £12,000 could be invested in a stocks and shares ISA.
The monthly pension could be topped up from your savings to £240 and contributed to her SIPP, gaining tax relief of £720.
1 -
handful said:It's very interesting to see how people view the same thing in very different ways. I've got a small DB pension available to me either now or at any point up to 65 when it is scheduled to pay out. Mine is a little bigger than the OPs, CETV of £85k and an income of circa £3500 PA. I view this as being the most valuable part of my pension in many ways because it's guaranteed even though it is only a relatively small part of my overall pension pot. I look at it as a way of funding something like all of our house and vehicle insurances for ever because it should grow at a similar rate to premiums increasing. Or maybe I could buy health insurance and it would fund that. I would never consider trying to cash it into my SIPP. It takes al sorts I suppose and please don't take that as an insult!
And although it represents a tiny tiny fraction of mine and Mrs Arty's overall pension provision, I'm very happy to have it. Because if the markets have a 20s style crash then depression, or if I somehow make some abysmal investing decisions, we will still have that plus 2 fully accrued SPs to survive on...
1 -
Beddie said:There should be a "I know what I'm doing and I am happy to take on the liabilities if I made a mistake" process.
That's what the OP needs, as do many others. They don't want full advice and the IFA doesn't want the future liabilities.
4 -
LHW99 said:Seems we are stuck with 3 options, take the 2.3k a year, take a 12k pot with 2k a year....or thirdly...possible expensive heart attack for nothing scenario!
Is there a third (fourth?) option of taking say £1k pa and a larger lump sum? Not as large as the CETV, but larger than otherwise.0 -
xylophone said:take the 2.3k a year, take a 12k pot with 2k a year....
The £12,000 could be invested in a stocks and shares ISA.
The monthly pension could be topped up from your savings to £240 and contributed to her SIPP, gaining tax relief of £720.
Thanks again for your earlier post, xylo. I looked into all of the links. Extremely helpful. Talking to the DB people it does seem quite possible to transfer into a SIPP but the stumbling block would be the exorbitant fee from an IFA, which would make this hardly worth it on a small amount...counter productive in investment terms. They said not to worry. The pension age thing would be on 31st Jan and if we miss that then it's just deferred, maybe re-calculated and back dated, so that has taken some of the pressure off for now.1 -
Beddie said:There should be a "I know what I'm doing and I am happy to take on the liabilities if I made a mistake" process.
That's what the OP needs, as do many others. They don't want full advice and the IFA doesn't want the future liabilities.
An online flowchart would do the job. Very similar to those used by Nutmeg etc. to decide your risk profile.
Someone with a nice DB pension as their main retirement asset is very different to someone who has other pensions, ISAs, properties etc. and a sound knowledge of what they are giving up.
And before you say "but what about the risks?" - they stay with the individual. Look at DC pensions and SIPPs now - you can take all of your money out in your late 50s to spend on cars and holidays, without any checks. A very foolish thing to do for many, but no one is stopping them. They might pay a lot more tax and end up being poorer in retirement, but that's allowed according to the rules. That needs to be tightened up and DB rules loosened, to end up with a similar process for all.0 -
scoobyjones1 said
A pension provider is holding your money, investing it and making a profit...SOME of which is passed on to the pensioner. Of course risk depends on the amount involved and your circumstances, as we are fully aware after many years investing or saving.
Who do you think tops up the scheme when there's isn't enough money in there to meet the guaranteed benefits they are committed to over the next 50 odd years at least?
You mention that it's taxable income, so are SIPP withdrawals so no real difference there.
You say your investment choices would do better and they may well do but yours are not guaranteed, this income and any CPI increases are. Looking at the CETV and thinking of it in the same way as a DC pot that can be invested is the wrong viewpoint. Look at the CETV as the bribe they are offering you to get rid of a potentially very costly liability (if your wife lived to 100 say).
If the scheme, with all the professional investment advice they get and the underlying promise from the employer to make good any shortfall, think that £80k invested for an unlimited time is the correct amount to deliver £2300 + CPI up to max 5% for the next 30 to 40 years are you sure you could do better? Even when you / your wife are in your 90s and still trying to manage your investments?
I can understand your frustration, but it is pointless in all honesty. Complaining about it on here will not change things. If you feel that strongly write to your MP as it was parliament that passed the legislation.
2 -
handful said:scoobyjones1 said:handful said:It's very interesting to see how people view the same thing in very different ways. I've got a small DB pension available to me either now or at any point up to 65 when it is scheduled to pay out. Mine is a little bigger than the OPs, CETV of £85k and an income of circa £3500 PA. I view this as being the most valuable part of my pension in many ways because it's guaranteed even though it is only a relatively small part of my overall pension pot. I look at it as a way of funding something like all of our house and vehicle insurances for ever because it should grow at a similar rate to premiums increasing. Or maybe I could buy health insurance and it would fund that. I would never consider trying to cash it into my SIPP. It takes al sorts I suppose and please don't take that as an insult!
Tech stocks have done very well for sure but that won't continue for ever. How do you intend to time when to de-invest before that crash when it happens? This last month or so has seen some great gains in my portfolio and I can see it would be easy to think that if I had that £85k CETV in my SIPP I would be much better off but I don't think of it like that. For me, if I live longer than expected or spend more than I should or lose out due to a crash, the one constant I don't have to worry about is the DB!0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards