We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fraudulent LPA and Banks Safeguarding responsibilities
Options
Comments
-
What mate - the one that witnessed it? When my Nan went into a care home with dementia, my Mum didn't have POA. She was able to get it but the person who said Nan had enough mental capacity to agree to this has to be someone 'official' I can't remember exactly what his official title was but I don't think he was a solicitor. Pretty sure my Mum couldn't turn up 'with a mate' to witness.
Also if bank hadn't been made aware of POA how was relative accessing money from the account anyway and if it's because they knew her log ins/pin numbers then why go to the extent of getting POA?
0 -
Spendless said:What mate - the one that witnessed it? When my Nan went into a care home with dementia, my Mum didn't have POA. She was able to get it but the person who said Nan had enough mental capacity to agree to this has to be someone 'official' I can't remember exactly what his official title was but I don't think he was a solicitor. Pretty sure my Mum couldn't turn up 'with a mate' to witness.
Also if bank hadn't been made aware of POA how was relative accessing money from the account anyway and if it's because they knew her log ins/pin numbers then why go to the extent of getting POA?
But if someone already has a dementia diagnosis and it’s likely that the power-of-attorney will be open to challenge with the OPG, then it makes sense to get a solicitor or someone independent who really understands the Mental Capacity Act to head off any queries further down the line.
The need for a power-of-attorney (or depoutyship) once someone loses capacity is because it’s financial abuse to access someone’s account with their pin number with nothing legal being in place. And in this case, probably because they couldn’t sell the house without it.But the system is open to abuse – the OPG is under resourced, and there’s nowhere near enough checks carried out.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards