We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
O2 'unable' to remove fraudulent hard search from my credit report
Options
Comments
-
arealltheusernamestaken said:EnPointe said:arealltheusernamestaken said:MorningcoffeeIV said:Raise a formal complaint.
But also don't sweat it. A single utility search will have no impact on you.
Thank you. A good idea. Needless to say, they have not exactly helped me down that route and -- in keeping with the 'system says no' approach thus far -- would like an account number of course. But putting it in a letter would at least be cathartic.
I do realise the single search is not that damaging, but it's still infuriating that I can go out of my way to save them from losing a £1K+ phone and a lot of time/hassle, and they do nothing to save me from penalty. Vodafone did that, and reported it to Action Fraud, in a single phone call. Everyone happy.
Anyway, 'write to O2 to complain (again)' has been on my to do list for too long already. You've motivated me to finally do it and just avoid ever dealing with them again.
The hit to my credit rating. However large or small it was, it should not have cost me a single point. I did the right thing. I saved them the cost of the most expensive phone they sold at the time. They did nothing for me.
Also, worth noting that the collective hit to my credit rating from the tsunami of hard searches that happened initially (bank accounts, mobile accounts, etc... all created either before I was aware of them or before I had learned all the steps you need to take to slow the fraudsters' progress) was significant, even if each individual one was not huge. *All* of those organisations wiped the hard searches from my record except O2.
If you can point to a measurable and provable loss such as a higher rate of loan and can show this entry was the reason, you might have justificationSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards