PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Breach of restrictive covenant - cannot park in front of the house
Comments
-
If you ring the council, that will prevent you from getting indemnity insurance, as you will have alerted them to the potential problem you wish to insure against.
"Money will only make you more of what you already are." T. Harv Eker5 -
Dustyevsky said:If you ring the council, that will prevent you from getting indemnity insurance, as you will have alerted them to the potential problem you wish to insure against.0
-
[iD] said:Dustyevsky said:If you ring the council, that will prevent you from getting indemnity insurance, as you will have alerted them to the potential problem you wish to insure against.Do you mean the planning application documents, or the application for the council to drop the kerb?If the latter, then they may not have it any more, and if they do, then they probably won't share it with you unless you were the owner. Unlike planning, the dropped kerb application isn't a public document.Although knowing whether the dropped kerb is legal or not can be useful, in your case if there is a covenant prohibiting parking then whether the dropped kerb is legal or not is (to a large degree) a moot point. If they* don't want you parking on the drive then they can seek to enforce the covenant rather than having to do anything about the kerb. (assuming either a unitary council, or a County/District willing to cooperate)Does the planning application show it was approved? Are you able to see the documents for that?1
-
I couldn't find the planning application outcome as its not available on the council's website.
There was a mention of "Construction of vehicular crossover" application with its reference number on the rear extension application approval.
The property had at least two modifications that I'm aware of
1990 - Construction of vehicular crossover
2008 - Single story rear extension
I have asked my solicitors to get the documents for vehicle crossover application/approval. I also discussed with them the future implication on the property value and legality of it. She said if and when I sell the property in the future, this issue will be raised as an enquiry and you can transfer the indemnity to the new buyer but this does not and should not have a negative impact on the value of the property. Also, if council at some point in the future decides to implement the covenant, we would have the indemnity insurance to cover the reduction in house value, cost of work to rollback front porch and legal cost.
In practice, this covenant doesn't seem to be the problem as everyone's doing it and been doing it for ages but there's always the off chance of it which is why the indemnity insurance is required and sellers have agreed to pay for it.
I understand all that but the biggest selling point of the property for me is/was the big driveway and garden hence the offer I made. If that is at the risk legally, would you guys suggest reduction in offer price? If yes, by how much? I know it sounds like I'm chancing it but- its a real concern and I don't want to pay a lot for a driveway that's always at risk
- why not get it cheaper if I there's a chance that upon me selling the property another buyer might raise the same and ask for a "discount" in price due to the limitation
Attached a GSV for reference0 -
As you say, the indemnity policy covers the risk of a reduction in property value - so what would be the justification for reducing your price? That's having your cake and eating it. The same argument is going to apply to any future buyer from you.
And why do you have a "real concern" of enforcement?2 -
user1977 said:As you say, the indemnity policy covers the risk of a reduction in property value - so what would be the justification for reducing your price? That's having your cake and eating it. The same argument is going to apply to any future buyer from you.
And why do you have a "real concern" of enforcement?
I have a real concern because nevertheless the risk of council enforcing the covenant is there no matter how low.0 -
When I've had a 'real concern' about a property, I've factored it into the price I've offered, or simply walked away, especially if it was something I'd no power to change. That's resulted in many, many rejections, but given how things worked out, I've no regrets. I can't speak for others, of course.
"Money will only make you more of what you already are." T. Harv Eker1 -
[iD] said:user1977 said:As you say, the indemnity policy covers the risk of a reduction in property value - so what would be the justification for reducing your price? That's having your cake and eating it. The same argument is going to apply to any future buyer from you.
And why do you have a "real concern" of enforcement?
I have a real concern because nevertheless the risk of council enforcing the covenant is there no matter how low.
You'd have a "real concern" about any sort of risk, even if really tiny?
Seriously, this is nothing. The whole street is like it is and obviously has been for decades. Find something else to worry about. We can give you a list of 1001 more likely problems...2 -
[iD] said:I couldn't find the planning application outcome as its not available on the council's website.
There was a mention of "Construction of vehicular crossover" application with its reference number on the rear extension application approval.
The property had at least two modifications that I'm aware of
1990 - Construction of vehicular crossover
2008 - Single story rear extension
I have asked my solicitors to get the documents for vehicle crossover application/approval. I also discussed with them the future implication on the property value and legality of it. She said if and when I sell the property in the future, this issue will be raised as an enquiry and you can transfer the indemnity to the new buyer but this does not and should not have a negative impact on the value of the property. Also, if council at some point in the future decides to implement the covenant, we would have the indemnity insurance to cover the reduction in house value, cost of work to rollback front porch and legal cost.
In practice, this covenant doesn't seem to be the problem as everyone's doing it and been doing it for ages but there's always the off chance of it which is why the indemnity insurance is required and sellers have agreed to pay for it.
I understand all that but the biggest selling point of the property for me is/was the big driveway and garden hence the offer I made. If that is at the risk legally, would you guys suggest reduction in offer price? If yes, by how much? I know it sounds like I'm chancing it but- its a real concern and I don't want to pay a lot for a driveway that's always at risk
- why not get it cheaper if I there's a chance that upon me selling the property another buyer might raise the same and ask for a "discount" in price due to the limitation
Attached a GSV for reference0 -
propertyrental said:[iD] said:I couldn't find the planning application outcome as its not available on the council's website.
There was a mention of "Construction of vehicular crossover" application with its reference number on the rear extension application approval.
The property had at least two modifications that I'm aware of
1990 - Construction of vehicular crossover
2008 - Single story rear extension
I have asked my solicitors to get the documents for vehicle crossover application/approval. I also discussed with them the future implication on the property value and legality of it. She said if and when I sell the property in the future, this issue will be raised as an enquiry and you can transfer the indemnity to the new buyer but this does not and should not have a negative impact on the value of the property. Also, if council at some point in the future decides to implement the covenant, we would have the indemnity insurance to cover the reduction in house value, cost of work to rollback front porch and legal cost.
In practice, this covenant doesn't seem to be the problem as everyone's doing it and been doing it for ages but there's always the off chance of it which is why the indemnity insurance is required and sellers have agreed to pay for it.
I understand all that but the biggest selling point of the property for me is/was the big driveway and garden hence the offer I made. If that is at the risk legally, would you guys suggest reduction in offer price? If yes, by how much? I know it sounds like I'm chancing it but- its a real concern and I don't want to pay a lot for a driveway that's always at risk
- why not get it cheaper if I there's a chance that upon me selling the property another buyer might raise the same and ask for a "discount" in price due to the limitation
Attached a GSV for reference0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.4K Spending & Discounts
- 240.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.6K Life & Family
- 254K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards