We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Second mortgage after separating
 
            
                
                    csswiift                
                
                    Posts: 76 Forumite
         
             
         
         
             
         
         
             
                         
            
                        
             
         
         
            
                    I purchased a property with my partner 18 months ago on a 60 month term. We’ve now separated and decided to rent the property out rather than paying an early redemption fee if we sold.
I’m now looking to purchase another property for myself and have a 10% deposit, but wondered how a lender would treat this? Are there lenders who would lend on a second property with 10% deposit?
Thanks
                I’m now looking to purchase another property for myself and have a 10% deposit, but wondered how a lender would treat this? Are there lenders who would lend on a second property with 10% deposit?
Thanks
0        
            Comments
- 
            Firstly, you're probably not even allowed to rent that property as the mortgage you have is not a buy-to-let property.
 And that complicates situation further..3
- 
            On a personal level. Biting the bullet and paying the redemption fee might be the best option. At least then you can both go your separate ways. Financial associations with ex partners can often end being problematic.2
- 
            
 And secondly, actually answering the question?Newbie_John said:Firstly, you're probably not even allowed to rent that property as the mortgage you have is not a buy-to-let property.
 And that complicates situation further..0
- 
            A few considerations here.
 The new Lender for the purchase will most likely want to see you have consent to let from the current lender.
 If the rent covers the mortgage costs that is good, if it does not it will impact on your affordability for the new purchase.
 The new Lender may have a problem with the deposit size (depending on the Lender chosen).
 Finally you will pay an extra 3.00% stamp duty land tax on any new purchase in England.
 A case for a mortgage broker.I am a Mortgage Broker
 You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Broker, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0
- 
            
 well when you have discussed with the mortgage company if they will allow you to let and maybe charge you more interest, then sit down and do the sums to see how much income (after expenses) this will bring in + factor in the hassle of being a landlord. Then discuss with a broker re the new mortgage - probably totally depends on income including any from the letting business.csswiift said:
 And secondly, actually answering the question?Newbie_John said:Firstly, you're probably not even allowed to rent that property as the mortgage you have is not a buy-to-let property.
 And that complicates situation further..
 you have 10% but guess you might need more saved in case there are any expensive repairs needed at the rental property
 TBH - just pay the redemption fee and go your own way2
- 
            
 As things stand it's not possible, to get a new mortgage you need to prove that you have a consent to let for the other property - this could cost higher interest rate, extra fees, or can simply be rejected - depending on a bank - then the only other option is to remortgage to BTL - but that would require you to pay the fee you're trying to avoid.csswiift said:
 And secondly, actually answering the question?Newbie_John said:Firstly, you're probably not even allowed to rent that property as the mortgage you have is not a buy-to-let property.
 And that complicates situation further..
 Once that's sorted out, it's back to affordability. So this is the answer really, it can be done.0
- 
            Considering you are going to get stung with an additional 3% Stamp Duty charge if in England, 4% in Wales or a colossal 6% in Scotland on top of normal stamp duty charges along with converting to a BTL mortgage and all associated costs I think you would be wiser paying the ERC and selling.0
- 
            Is it possible to have two residential mortgages.
 Yes - if you can afford it, this is possible.
 In your specific situation, it is probably going to work out cheaper to see and pay the ERC.
 Others have mentioned the stamp duty, the consent to let issue, satisfying a new lender on the mortgage on the existing property not to mention remaining financially tied to somebody who may or may not decide to make your life difficult.
 Sometimes the financial tie up is unavoidable (divorce with kids etc) but if there is a way to avoid this, then that is always the best option.
 Finally, presuming you have some meaningful equity in the already owned property you will have a much bigger deposit, and you won't have to worry about having tenants and what happens if they don't pay...i.e. you will need to find the money to cover both mortgages!0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
 
         
 
          
         
 
         