We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
My DB pension: the promise, the reality, and the influence of wage suppression
Options
Comments
-
MattMattMattUK said:2nd_time_buyer said:My experience of people working into the 70s and 80s at University is they do it because they want to rather than they need to.
It is a strange juxtaposition for an academic. Within their field they can be very well known, respected, and by definition they are an expert. They are doing a mentally stimulating job around interesting people. On retirement they can lose a large chunk of their identity. We have academics still coming in full time despite being retired and not been paid
All the research that keeping mentally and physically active is the best way to stave off many of the effects of aging and that mental capacity can drop significantly and fairly quickly for those who stop using their minds on a regular basis.
I do agree with the identity side of things, I think that is true of a lot of people, not just those in academia though, anyone who has had a career tends to struggle with a partial loss of identity and routine when leaving work.
Some people are just luckier than others when it comes down to it, look at all the footballers that have dementia, I doubt any amount of mental stimulation would offset that. My mum suffered from dementia, which was caused by a blood clot in the brain, again not sure mental stimulation would have stopped the blood clot.It's just my opinion and not advice.3 -
Universidad said:SouthCoastBoy said:Still not bad for 15 years service when compared to a dc scheme.Quite hard to say I think. I've often wondered, but there are too many variables to consider - including that I would have not chosen that career if the pension wasn't up to snuff - and if you doubt me on this, consider that I eventually left it for that reason, despite the "incumbent" advantage.
There was always a vaunted promise in the University sector which was "you'll never be rich, but you'll be comfortable in retirement".That promise has been broken. Admittedly I wasn't as tuned in back then, but it was still relevant.
Outside the sector I would have had a higher salary (indeed now that I'm outside it again, I do have a higher salary, despite working in the public sector.)I've seen some younger folks attempted analysis of the current USS scheme vs just sticking their 10% into a SIPP, and honestly it's a lot tighter than you'd expect - but of course, these are the early career years where the DC pot is invested for the longest.
While there are a lot of dependencies (e.g. critically on annuity rates/ safe withdrawal rates at retirement), essentially income from DC pensions can often exceed that from DB pensions when the latter are inflation capped at 2.5%, at 5% cap the case for either is more marginal. The income from fully index linked DB pensions is unlikely to be exceeded by that of a DC pension with reasonable contribution rates.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards