PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

EA asking buyer to pay for ID/AML checks

Options
124»

Comments

  • BikingBud
    BikingBud Posts: 2,530 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    SadieO said:
    Robbo66 said:
    Angepet said:
    We've just bought and simply provided EA with ID and bank statements at no charge. Solicitor did checks via credas for which we were charged. Be better if this was uniform across yhe industry.
    Then the agent you bought from didn't do as the legislation requires, simply taking copies of bank statements and I.D isn't doing an AML check. Not doing it correctly can mean huge fines. Have a look at this article it explains the actual process agents need to follow  
    https://www.estateagenttoday.co.uk/features/2022/2/insight--an-estate-agents-guide-to-aml
    How do you know the agent didn't go through that process? From the article it seems that the agent needs to run the buyer's details through various checks, which they would do once they had recieved their ID and bank statements. Unless I am missing something there is nothing to suggest due process wasn't followed, it's just that the agent might not have actually informed the buyer that they were doing so??

    To resurrect an earlier post but pertinent to the discussion, the guidance provided by a trade body is not legislation!

    The HMRC guidance provides:

    Risk based approach 
    5.1   A risk-based approach is where you assess the risks that your business could be used for money laundering, terrorist financing or proliferation financing and put in place appropriate measures to mitigate those risks. A risk-based approach should balance the costs to your business and customers with a realistic assessment of the risk that criminals may exploit the business for money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing. It allows you to focus your efforts on the areas of highest risk areas and reduce unnecessary burdens.

    and

    5.19   You must also show how you will: 

    - carry out customer due diligence checks and conduct ongoing monitoring 

    5.20   The following actions are also required to be covered within your policies, controls and procedures and must be kept under regular review: 

    - ensure identification and acceptance procedures reflect the risk characteristics of all clients.

    5.45   Procedures should be easily accessible to staff and detailed enough to allow staff to understand and follow them easily. They must include as a minimum: 

    - the types of clients and transactions that you consider to be lower risk and why they may qualify for simplified due diligence and those that are higher risk and merit closer scrutiny 

    Without reading the whole 197 page document it would appear that they are not obliged to complete AML checks but to carry out risk assessments, including determining which clients might be lower risk, due diligence only and higher risk, merit closer scrutiny.

    Hence, using the information provided by the solicitor is perfectly acceptable, reduces duplication, reduces cost and also reduces risk of differing assessment leading to stalled progress.

    Ask to see their AML policy.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.