🗳️ ELECTION 2024: THE MSE LEADERS' DEBATE Got a burning question you want us to ask the party leaders ahead of the general election? Submit your suggestions via this form or post them on our dedicated Forum board where you can see and upvote other users' questions. Please note that the Forum's rules on avoiding general political discussion still apply across all boards.
Pension Investment Performance
Options
magd36
Posts: 75 Forumite
I started a pension in 2015 which has had total growth of 5% (current growth/total invested). I received 4%fixed in a single year on a savings account just matured. Are pensions that are invested really worth the risk or does the government simply need people to invest? I won’t be surprised if the growth goes negative but just think it’s terrible these risks are taken with pensions. Yeah it could go up but it could also go down. 8 years is a reasonable amount of time and it hasn’t even matched inflation.
0
Comments
-
The key consideration for questions like this is what specifically are you invested in? Fees can also make a difference so which provider and you with? And when do you anticipate needing access to the money?1
-
eskbanker said:The key consideration for questions like this is what specifically are you invested in? Fees can also make a difference so which provider and you with? And when do you anticipate needing access to the money?0
-
magd36 said:It’s a standard company run standard life pension scheme. Relatively low fees and shouldn’t be high riskmagd36 said:
In terms of when the money will be needed it will be different for everyone based on their age. [...] Fortunately, I don’t have a specific time I need to take it so can wait if the performance is poor but not everyone can.magd36 said:
My point is that 8 years should be long enough to match inflation.1 -
I just selected a balanced fund. It’s a mix of various things equities, bonds, property. It’s currently split into 3 parts {40% growth, 40% low risk, 20% secure). My point is the average person shouldn’t need to understand markets and risk their pension. There just seems no alternative.0
-
magd36 said:I just selected a balanced fund. It’s a mix of various things equities, bonds, property. It’s currently split into 3 parts {40% growth, 40% low risk, 20% secure). My point is the average person shouldn’t need to understand markets and risk their pension. There just seems no alternative.1
-
That’s what we keep getting told but I don’t think the evidence that cash would’t have out performed this fund over the last 8 years is there. The so called secure fund has fell 2.5% over the last 3 months. I think there should be an option for those tha Want the security (especially in later years)0
-
magd36 said:I just selected a balanced fund. It’s a mix of various things equities, bonds, property. It’s currently split into 3 parts {40% growth, 40% low risk, 20% secure). My point is the average person shouldn’t need to understand markets and risk their pension. There just seems no alternative.
For some comparison, since 2015 something like Vanguard's VLS40 fund which has 40% equities has averaged about 4% annual gain for a total gain of about 37% over the last 8 years. Higher equity allocations have done better; I've had roughly 85% equity, 15% bonds in my defined contribution pension, mostly in low cost index funds, and it's investment gain has been 8% annual average which is a cumulative 85% total gain and is very similar to just putting the money into VLS80.1 -
magd36 said:That’s what we keep getting told but I don’t think the evidence that cash would’t have out performed this fund over the last 8 years is there. The so called secure fund has fell 2.5% over the last 3 months. I think there should be an option for those tha Want the security (especially in later years)You may (or may not) find this video illuminating.1
-
Bostonerimus1 said:magd36 said:I just selected a balanced fund. It’s a mix of various things equities, bonds, property. It’s currently split into 3 parts {40% growth, 40% low risk, 20% secure). My point is the average person shouldn’t need to understand markets and risk their pension. There just seems no alternative.
For some comparison, since 2015 something like Vanguard's VLS40 fund which has 40% equities has averaged about 4% annual gain for a total gain of about 37% over the last 8 years. Higher equity allocations have done better; I've had roughly 85% equity, 15% bonds in my defined contribution pension, mostly in low cost index funds, and it's investment gain has been 8% annual average which is a cumulative 85% total gain and is very similar to just putting the money into VLS80.0 -
DoublePolaroid said:magd36 said:That’s what we keep getting told but I don’t think the evidence that cash would’t have out performed this fund over the last 8 years is there. The so called secure fund has fell 2.5% over the last 3 months. I think there should be an option for those tha Want the security (especially in later years)You may (or may not) find this video illuminating.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 2 Election 2024: The MSE Leaders' Debate
- 343.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 450K Spending & Discounts
- 236K Work, Benefits & Business
- 609.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.4K Life & Family
- 248.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards