We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Appeal Devere parking services


Hi there
Would you be in help with two parking charge
notices from Devere parking services for parking in private parking space and let me
know whether worth it appealing or just pay them.
Just to confirm, the driver is a regular visitor
to the building centre.
The parking charge notices both were issued for
the reason:
(did not park in the allocated bay to the business
resident in/visiting).
The default in the charge notices both:
1- Have location: Pine court business park,
Bournemouth, the correct address: Pine court business Centre, 36 Gervis road, BH1 3DH. not
park.
2- The delivered for the notices by post to the car
keeper, one of the notice was delivered 22 days after of the incident.
3- The new policy put on place just recently 1st August, and
the building management sent a one month notice to the offices occupiers. This
change in the policy notice was sent to a personal email and the office
occupier missed it, so there is no awareness of the policy change.
4- The parking bay doesn't have a clear visible number or letter, to
distinguish whether the bay for visitor or allocated to a business
office.
5- There is not clear signage close to the parking bay where the car was parked,
so as a regular visitor didn't notice any change in the parking place.
6- The photo attached with the charge notice show that the car was parked less
than an hour, and based on the term and condition, the maximum stay 2 hours for visitor. .
Comments
-
Whilst the NtK may have been delivered after 22 days, what is more important is the date it was "deemed" to have been delivered which is 2 working/business days after the date on the NtK. Can you show us a picture of the NtK. You just need to redact your name, address, VRN and PCN number. Everything else is OK and we can then ascertain whether the NtK is PoFA compliant.2
-
Plan A is always a complaint from the keeper to the landowner and their MP.
Plan B, if no cancellation is forthcoming, is an appeal using the template in blue text from the sticky Announcement for NEWBIES, sent from the keeper.
If the NTK was non-PoFA compliant (missing mandatory wording, or too late for keeper to be held liable) then add a one liner to say so, otherwise send it unaltered.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks2 -
The first NTK is not PoFA compliant because it is deemed to have arrived on day 15 (the 22nd of August) and therefore arrived too late to hold the keeper liable.
I don't think the wording of either NTK is PoFA compliant, but I'll let more knowledgeable posters comment on that.
If Plan A fails, the initial appeal goes to Devere. There is no point appealing to the IAS after that.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks2 -
The original NtK was issued within the timescale to allow PoFA to be invoked, even though the wording is not completely compliant and they don't refer to which Schedule and which paragraph of the Act they refer.
So, as they are likely to be relying on PoFA and the NtK loosely applies, there's not much reason not to identify as the driver. All the other arguments are as advised in the Newbies/FAQ thread, including poor, misleading or lack of prominence signs, lack of landowner authority etc. etc. apply.
Of course, as advised Plan A should be tried first. Plan B next but Plan C is about as useful as a poke in the arm with a sharp stick.2 -
B789 Plan A, is already done and refused from the building management.
So I have to go through the plan B and C. I have already prepared an appeal letters, Can I share them here to check please? thanks!
0 -
"Appeal Devere parking services"
There is no such thing. Did you read other IPC threads? You won't win on appeal.
I would just dispute it once (no IAS. It is a farce) then ignore them. We haven't heard of a daft Devere court claim in years. They aren't very good at court except in Poole where it was rumoured they had mates in high places at the court.
DO NOT PAY THEM.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
Coupon-mad I haven't checked the IPC thread yet, I'll do now. But the appeals have to go to IAS as far as the appeal concern, don't they? I am a new driver and I have no experience in those challenges I spent the last couple of days studying the law and how to appeal unfair parking charge notice.
0 -
No they don't have to go to IAS because you won't be doing that! My advice stands.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
B789 said:The original NtK was issued within the timescale to allow PoFA to be invoked, even though the wording is not completely compliant and they don't refer to which Schedule and which paragraph of the Act they refer.
So, as they are likely to be relying on PoFA and the NtK loosely applies, there's not much reason not to identify as the driver. All the other arguments are as advised in the Newbies/FAQ thread, including poor, misleading or lack of prominence signs, lack of landowner authority etc. etc. apply.
Of course, as advised Plan A should be tried first. Plan B next but Plan C is about as useful as a poke in the arm with a sharp stick.
There are 2 NTKs. The first one was for an alleged event on the 7th, = day zero. The NTK was issued on Friday the 18th, which was day 11. The second working day after the date of issue was Tuesday the 22nd, which was day 15, and therefore too late for keeper liability to apply.
I would appeal the first one using the template and add that since the NTK was given too late for the keeper too be held liable, they should cancel now and save themselves money.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks4
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards