We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Solicitor negligence when moving

jjscruffs
Posts: 3 Newbie

Solicitors first job when appointed is to perform the searches which is when they" check if any future planning developments or historical problems in the area might affect the home you're buying"
Ours neglected to mention the Tilbury to Norwich pylon development which was already planned at this point (a year ago)
We will be close to one of these 50m pylons which will devalue our property not to mention cause significant disruption with the construction over years
The solicitor was an !!!!!!. Really hard to get hold of, slowed the whole chain down and let us down about something else too
Just wondering if solicitors can be legally negligent in not bringing back key developments in the searches? could we sue the firm ?
Ours neglected to mention the Tilbury to Norwich pylon development which was already planned at this point (a year ago)
We will be close to one of these 50m pylons which will devalue our property not to mention cause significant disruption with the construction over years
The solicitor was an !!!!!!. Really hard to get hold of, slowed the whole chain down and let us down about something else too
Just wondering if solicitors can be legally negligent in not bringing back key developments in the searches? could we sue the firm ?
0
Comments
-
When were your searches performed (date)0
-
jjscruffs said:Solicitors first job when appointed is to perform the searches which is when they" check if any future planning developments or historical problems in the area might affect the home you're buying"
Ours neglected to mention the Tilbury to Norwich pylon development which was already planned at this point (a year ago)
We will be close to one of these 50m pylons which will devalue our property not to mention cause significant disruption with the construction over years
The solicitor was an !!!!!!. Really hard to get hold of, slowed the whole chain down and let us down about something else too
Just wondering if solicitors can be legally negligent in not bringing back key developments in the searches? could we sue the firm ?
0 -
Are you saying this was disclosed in the search, but not mentioned to you by your solicitor? Or was it simply outside whatever radius the search covered?
I'm not sure where you've quoted from, but your solicitor is not implicitly warranting to you that they've checked everything in the area which you might want to know about.2 -
Searches normally reveal issues relating to the land, but don't normally reveal matters that affect nearby land but not yours directly. So in this case I don't think that you have a case here.
1 -
Okay so assuming it was picked up on the searches and you were provided with them, why did you also not pick up on it when reviewing them?
I can't comment on how else they let you down, but there's always a common theme with these types of topics in that apparantly the Solicitor is always difficult and made things take longer than it should.
The irony being the poster tends to be the type who needs their hand held throughout and wants things done yesterday, meaning things do get missed because hey my friend with no conveyancing experience said this should only take 2 weeks to sort so how can I sue my solicitor because it's taking too long.
2 -
jjscruffs said:
Ours neglected to mention the Tilbury to Norwich pylon development which was already planned at this point (a year ago)
We will be close to one of these 50m pylons which will devalue our property not to mention cause significant disruption with the construction over years
It will be 50m away, quite some distance, have you taken advice on how that will affect the value of your house?0 -
lika_86 said:Searches normally reveal issues relating to the land, but don't normally reveal matters that affect nearby land but not yours directly. So in this case I don't think that you have a case here.Our solicitor didn’t go through them in details us, but just sent them over for us to review and satisfy ourselves1
-
jjscruffs said:Solicitors first job when appointed is to perform the searches which is when they" check if any future planning developments or historical problems in the area might affect the home you're buying"
Ours neglected to mention the Tilbury to Norwich pylon development which was already planned at this point (a year ago)
We will be close to one of these 50m pylons which will devalue our property not to mention cause significant disruption with the construction over years
The solicitor was an !!!!!!. Really hard to get hold of, slowed the whole chain down and let us down about something else too
Just wondering if solicitors can be legally negligent in not bringing back key developments in the searches? could we sue the firm ?
did they searches mention it and your solicitor didnt point it out to you?
or did the searches not mention this development at all?
if the searches didnt mention it, what was the radius they applied within the searches.
the fact that you believe the solicitor has otherwise also done a poor just isnt of very much relevance
1 -
jjscruffs said:Solicitors first job when appointed is to perform the searches which is when they" check if any future planning developments or historical problems in the area might affect the home you're buying"
Ours neglected to mention the Tilbury to Norwich pylon development which was already planned at this point (a year ago)
We will be close to one of these 50m pylons which will devalue our property not to mention cause significant disruption with the construction over years
The solicitor was an !!!!!!. Really hard to get hold of, slowed the whole chain down and let us down about something else too
Just wondering if solicitors can be legally negligent in not bringing back key developments in the searches? could we sue the firm ?
Did your searches mention this planning development? If so, your solicitor should have mentioned it in his Report on Title to you. However, presumably you also have a copy of the searches - did you spot it yourself?
Unfortunately, this proposed development has been alarming nearby residents to the point that there are now large signs up in various properties "Saying No to the Development". Did you not spot those when you viewed the property?
0 -
The National Grid are still in the consultation phase (actually it might have finished a week or so ago). Until they apply for permission its my understanding that they wont appear in any searches.
https://www.essex.gov.uk/news/2023/councils-set-out-concerns-consultation-opens-norwich-tilbury-proposals#
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards