We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Buildings Insurance for Flats
Comments
-
neilogg said:
This will have to be progressed through the Management Company of owners. Advice is being sought from the Listed Building Owners Club. There are probably two possibilities:
Carry our own risk, (collectively).
Consult another broker who may be able to explore options such as insurance based on market value.
Thanks for the various comments. Signing off.
It's unlikely that any insurer will charge you a lower premium, based on market value, when in reality the risk to them is the reinstatement cost (although I accept that in the event of a total loss, all you want is your investment back).
It's also unlikely that all of the leaseholders are mortgage-free and will not be subject to buildings insurance requirements.
Your wish to pay a lower premium is understandable, but your thinking is flawed, insofar as, even if you did insure on a market value basis, anything less than a total loss, the value of the claim will be the reinstatement cost - particularly as the the building is listed, and it's likely that reinstatement would be required (as opposed to a demolition job).
Good luck
SC
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards