We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

'Elephant in the room' question re IHT !

124»

Comments

  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Linton said:
    Is shoplifting OK if the staff don’t see you? 
    Yes, because shops make loads of money, and they exploit the poor, and it's a victimless crime, like punching someone in the dark. -Shoplifters, probably
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,936 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    uknick said:
    silvercar said:
    uknick said:
    silvercar said:
    uknick said:
    castle96 said:
    I wonder re this as well. The temptation to 'save' tax must be overwhelming (though a risk {plus a fine?})
    If they could prove the executor knew about the gifts, I think it would become tax evasion which can result in a custodial sentence.  But, to get a sentence you would have to be really, really stupid and not cooperate with HMRC.
    and if the executor is a solicitor?
    Not sure what your point is?  Do you think solicitors are immune from prosecution?
    I was thinking that some people only go to a solicitor when they have reason to. So in their whole lifetime they may only have used a conveyancing solicitor when they have bought or sold a home and a solicitor specialising in probate and wills when they wanted to write a will. As such the solicitor will only know as much as the deceased has told them. They may be unaware of all the savings accounts/ works of art/ classic cars/ wine/ property etc.

    It may even be that the deceased deliberately chooses a solicitor that they have had no previous contact with, to leave their offspring to decide what should be declared.
    No offence by the solicitor if they are in the dark about any gifts.  I suppose they might have to show due diligence in that they made an effort to look into gifts, but if the client tells them there were none what can they do. 
    A solicitor is not simply going to take the clients word on something that could land them with financial penalties.
    uknick said:
    uknick said:
    silvercar said:
    uknick said:
    silvercar said:
    uknick said:
    castle96 said:
    I wonder re this as well. The temptation to 'save' tax must be overwhelming (though a risk {plus a fine?})
    If they could prove the executor knew about the gifts, I think it would become tax evasion which can result in a custodial sentence.  But, to get a sentence you would have to be really, really stupid and not cooperate with HMRC.
    and if the executor is a solicitor?
    Not sure what your point is?  Do you think solicitors are immune from prosecution?
    I was thinking that some people only go to a solicitor when they have reason to. So in their whole lifetime they may only have used a conveyancing solicitor when they have bought or sold a home and a solicitor specialising in probate and wills when they wanted to write a will. As such the solicitor will only know as much as the deceased has told them. They may be unaware of all the savings accounts/ works of art/ classic cars/ wine/ property etc.

    It may even be that the deceased deliberately chooses a solicitor that they have had no previous contact with, to leave their offspring to decide what should be declared.
    No offence by the solicitor if they are in the dark about any gifts.  I suppose they might have to show due diligence in that they made an effort to look into gifts, but if the client tells them there were none what can they do. 
    A solicitor is not simply going to take the clients word on something that could land them with financial penalties.
    Agreed, which is why the client will need to sign the solicitor's terms of business which will include some form of clause indemnifying the solicitor in case the client has been economic with the truth.  Hence my comment about due diligence from the solicitor.
    The client in this case would be the deceased, who may not have seen their solicitor since they wrote the will many years ago.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The client in this case would be the deceased, who may not have seen their solicitor since they wrote the will many years ago.
    Only if the solicitor is the executor, in which case they have the power to directly obtain the client's bank statements etc, and make all reasonable efforts to uncover any gifts.

    If the solicitor has been hired by the executors then the clients are the executors.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.