We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
First-time buyers 'at fresh low'
Options
Comments
-
because you can only compare averages with average to get any kind of meaningful outcome.
in many places in this country average wages price you out of ALL property types in the town.It's a health benefit ...0 -
Its okay because house prices only ever go up due to lack of supply and I heard that Gordon Brown has invented a new Super Subprime Mortgage to be issued through the nationalised version of Northern Wreck that will give a woman in Huddersfield enough multiples of her own income working part time in Labrokes to buy the entire Borough of Hackney as a buy-to-let.0
-
Curious, not that there isn't a problem for 1st time buyers, but why does the article compare avergae house price with "average income of first-time buyer households" rather than the average house price of the sort of houses bought by FTB (eg flats/2 bed terrace/fixer-uppers etc)
They dont.The average price paid by a first-time buyer for a property increased by 15% during this year to £175,093.
It's still a pretty meaningless article though. It doesn't touch on expected future changes in income or availability of credit for example, both of which are important factors for FTBs.
Just another space filler.
Did you know that the BBC used not to have a news program if there wasn't any news? Now they have a 24 hour channel regardless.0 -
Kill News24 and you still have the behemoth of the Internet to deal with.BLOODBATH IN THE EVENING THEN? :shocked: OR PERHAPS THE AFTERNOON? OR THE MORNING? OH, FORGET THIS MALARKEY!
THE KILLERS :cool:
THE PUNISHER :dance: MATURE CHEDDAR ADDICT:cool:0 -
I'm sat in an ideal FTB house - we were FTB when we bought it. We are looking to move but don't have to.
We were looking at testing the market after Xmas, but the imposition of HIPS on 2 bed homes mean we won't be bothering. £300+ up front in an uncertain market is a waste of cash to us - sorry FTBs.0 -
We were looking at testing the market after Xmas0
-
I'm sat in an ideal FTB house - we were FTB when we bought it. We are looking to move but don't have to.
We were looking at testing the market after Xmas, but the imposition of HIPS on 2 bed homes mean we won't be bothering. £300+ up front in an uncertain market is a waste of cash to us - sorry FTBs.
:rolleyes: You are either serious about selling your house and trading up or you aren't. You'll end up paying thousands in fees and duty when you do sell and move so 300 quid up front is peanuts.
Were you going to put it on the market, see what you could get and then look for a new place? If so, you've done the FTB who might have made the offer a favour as no doubt they'd have been messed around as you nonchelantly looked around for somewhere to move to after you got your offer and then maybe decided not to move after all.
Moving up the housing ladder isn't like going shopping for a new pair of jeans. We're talking about much searching, negociation and borrowing of large amounts of cash.--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0 -
I too find it quite pathetic that the £200-400 cost of a HIP is claimed as killing the housing market.
People like EAs, RICS, krusty allslop etc. who campaigned against it are now using it as an excuse for why the market is slowing/crashing.
When everyone knows the real reason is that money is drying up due the credit crunch, which itself is due to us having reached a tipping point in the cycle of boom and bust.
Houses have too long been too expensive for the average person by any conventional measure you choose to use. And when that happens, then a correction is due.
HIP avoidance (or timewasting as it used to be called) will not save us from the crash.
happy christmas to all my readers.
:beer:dolce vita's stock reply templates
#1. The people that run these "sell your house and rent back" companies are generally lying thieves and are best avoided
#2. This time next year house prices in general will be lower than they are now
#3. Cheap houses are a good thing not a bad thing0 -
:rolleyes: You are either serious about selling your house and trading up or you aren't. You'll end up paying thousands in fees and duty when you do sell and move so 300 quid up front is peanuts.
Ah yes, but the HIP is an upfront cost whereas you can pay the other costs of moving out of equity.0 -
Ah yes, but the HIP is an upfront cost whereas you can pay the other costs of moving out of equity.
And this is why we have arrived at this situation.
"equity" is all that people have now. No savings, nothing but equity. (and debt).
Rampant HPI is supposed to have made us all wealthier and yet some sellers haven't even got £400 to pay for a HIP.
It really is fvcking pathetic.
(have a nice christmas gen)dolce vita's stock reply templates
#1. The people that run these "sell your house and rent back" companies are generally lying thieves and are best avoided
#2. This time next year house prices in general will be lower than they are now
#3. Cheap houses are a good thing not a bad thing0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards