We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Increasing Tenant Rent

124»

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newbie
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 24 January 2025 at 4:59PM
    It's their home, and you have a responsibility to them.  
    No they don't.  It's a commercial relationship.

    The reason that there are strong protections for tenants, and the government is looking to end Section 21, is because landlords do have an obligation to the people whose home it is.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newbie
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 24 January 2025 at 4:59PM
    Sea_Shell said:
    It's their home, and you have a responsibility to them.  
    No they don't.  It's a commercial relationship.

    It should be, but probably wouldn't stop a LL being named and flamed on SM, if they either raised the rent, or issued notice, on a "vulnerable" tenant.

    Where should private LLs responsibility start/stop if their tenant has, say, disabled children, or is a elderly decorated war hero?

    Lots of business have a responsibility above simply making as much money as they can. GP surgeries, for example.

    If landlords feel that the responsibility of owning someone else's home is too much for them, if they gambled on cheap mortgages and lost, their first responsibility is still to the tenants. They should get out of the LL business in a way that avoids problems for the tenants so far as possible.
  • motorman99
    motorman99 Posts: 128 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 January 2025 at 4:59PM
    Selling to the tenants at a good price (just cover what you paid for it - you already made plenty of profit) is the best option.

    It's their home, and you have a responsibility to them.  You don't want to be out of pocket of course, but it expecting them to cover a bad business decision isn't right either.
    And do you still think the above is something you’d do? 

    If so, do let me know next time you sell your house, I’ll buy it.
  • jimbog
    jimbog Posts: 2,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 January 2025 at 4:59PM
    Sea_Shell said:
    It's their home, and you have a responsibility to them.  
    No they don't.  It's a commercial relationship.

    It should be, but probably wouldn't stop a LL being named and flamed on SM, if they either raised the rent, or issued notice, on a "vulnerable" tenant.

    Where should private LLs responsibility start/stop if their tenant has, say, disabled children, or is a elderly decorated war hero?

    Lots of business have a responsibility above simply making as much money as they can. GP surgeries, for example.


    these are in the public sector
    Gather ye rosebuds while ye may
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newbie
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 24 January 2025 at 4:59PM
    Selling to the tenants at a good price (just cover what you paid for it - you already made plenty of profit) is the best option.

    It's their home, and you have a responsibility to them.  You don't want to be out of pocket of course, but it expecting them to cover a bad business decision isn't right either.
    And do you still think the above is something you’d do? 

    If so, do let me know next time you sell your house, I’ll buy it.

    I wouldn't do it because I'm not in a position to take on that responsibility.
  • motorman99
    motorman99 Posts: 128 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    I don’t think anyone would do it to be honest. 
  • CSI_Yorkshire
    CSI_Yorkshire Posts: 1,792 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 24 January 2025 at 4:59PM
    Selling to the tenants at a good price (just cover what you paid for it - you already made plenty of profit) is the best option.

    It's their home, and you have a responsibility to them.  You don't want to be out of pocket of course, but it expecting them to cover a bad business decision isn't right either.
    And do you still think the above is something you’d do? 

    If so, do let me know next time you sell your house, I’ll buy it.

    I wouldn't do it because I'm not in a position to take on that responsibility.
    The responsibility of selling your house at a price that just covers what you paid for it?
  • Luckily we don't live in a communist country. 
  • Bigphil1474
    Bigphil1474 Posts: 3,918 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    OP, i think it's up to you what you do with the extra costs you are facing, but as some have said, best to let the tenants know what is coming.

    If it was me, I'd consider what I'm making in terms of property value increase and rent, and make sure that any increase in rent is still around market rate for the property and area. Ultimately, it wouldn't be right for you to be struggling to pay the mortgage while the tenants get a relatively cheap rent, but if they are good tenants, it might be worth sharing the pain. If the existing tenants can't or won't pay the increased rent, who's to say that you would get any new tenants that would.
  • caprikid1
    caprikid1 Posts: 2,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I am disgusted at the thoughtless comments made re rigolith's post. Tenants are people who live in their HOME and deserve respect. Owning many flats and houses, I have instructed my agents to cap all 2023 rent increases to 3%. My income drops but I will always be making a profit. And tenants can call the property their HOME.
    Why do you need to make a profit out of your tenants? Is it because it's your business? 

    Your post doesn't make any sense. Why is your rent increase ok? 
    Every landlord wants to make a profit from my tenants, and I do-----just as anyone selling their house wants to make a profit. It's merely my "business" to get the best profit I can ( within ethical constraints) from all my investments, whether they be shares portfolio, stocks, bonds, collectibles such as gold and coins and paintings. Part of my investments are in the form of rentable property. What's not to understand ?

    Who said my rent increase is OK ? Not me. I merely mentioned it because it shows that some landlords are not squeezing tenants at this time of hardship for them----I have been capping my rents at 3% all year at a time when the inflation rate has been in double figures and , even now, the rate is far more than double my 3%. I can show you many letters of appreciation from my happy tenants----it's a good thing to hold out a helping hand when you are well-heeled whilst so many tenants are struggling. I don't see why you should post in the manner you did.
    Many of us Landlords are not increasing their rents at all, in my case 40% of it will go straight to the government so why should I give the government even more money . I know non of my tenants are rolling in cash so I only increase rent when I am facing major expenditure or changing tenants. If my costs have not risen significantly (TAX Deductible anyway).
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.