We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Would you feel comfortable putting more than £85K with Natwest?
Comments
-
Also bear in mind that the limit is per person, so if it is joint accounts the limit is £170k0
-
No, they would probably start sharing my account details with the BBC...3
-
I don't understand why anyone would want to put more than £85k into Nat West. They don't have any accounts that pay outstanding returns........or is there something I'm missing ?
1 -
It's offering 5.9% AER on a two year fixed rate bond for balances of £100k+ which is not bad for a high street name most people will be comfortable with vs 6.05% AER at the moment with the market leaders for the same duration.subjecttocontract said:I don't understand why anyone would want to put more than £85k into Nat West. They don't have any accounts that pay outstanding returns........or is there something I'm missing ?
0 -
By holding > £85k you are risking
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/freedom-of-information/2021/questions-about-bail-in-and-customer-deposits
In line with the creditor hierarchy, deposits not protected by the FSCS would only be subject to bail-in if losses are so high that subjecting all of the shareholders and a number of debt-holders to bail-in would not be sufficient (for further detail see page 19 of the Executing-bail-in-an-operational-guide-from-the-Bank-of-EnglandOpens in a new window). This is because of the preference in the creditor hierarchy from which certain deposits, including those of retail depositors, benefit.
0 -
No I wouldn't; if I'm asking this Q then there must be an element of doubt floating around so that would answer my Q without asking a bunch of people I don't actually know about my own money0
-
I think the doubt is something to do with Nigel Farage wanting an exclusive bank account.VKE said:No I wouldn't; if I'm asking this Q then there must be an element of doubt floating around so that would answer my Q without asking a bunch of people I don't actually know about my own money
0 -
Thanks, this is the ISA I am on about two years at 5.9% which only needs a minimum of £1kwmb194 said:
It's offering 5.9% AER on a two year fixed rate bond for balances of £100k+ which is not bad for a high street name most people will be comfortable with vs 6.05% AER at the moment with the market leaders for the same duration.subjecttocontract said:I don't understand why anyone would want to put more than £85k into Nat West. They don't have any accounts that pay outstanding returns........or is there something I'm missing ?

0 -
Coutts has it's own banking license so the OP wouldn't be placing funds with NatWest Bank.phillw said:
I think the doubt is something to do with Nigel Farage wanting an exclusive bank account.VKE said:No I wouldn't; if I'm asking this Q then there must be an element of doubt floating around so that would answer my Q without asking a bunch of people I don't actually know about my own money
0 -
I highly rate Coutts and my experience with them has been of the very highest degree of excellence, especially as I have no controversial views that they might not like
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards



