We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Home insurance with a home battery
Options
Comments
-
Slinky said:Aretnap said:wiscombe64 said:CSI_Yorkshire said:That's not the only general principle that applies though.
To take the unexploded bomb collector - would a reasonable layperson think that such an activity was "taking care to prevent damage".
If the collector had the bombs suspended from strings and swinging around the house, and a penchant for tapping them with a stick for luck, probably not
If the collector had them in strong metal boxes with locks, away from heat sources etc, they probably would.
Interpretation of wording is always vague because nobody could ever write a document that precisely covered every possible situation.
It’s at one end (or off the end!) of a spectrum of risk isn’t it? My point is it’s unclear to me where the point on the spectrum is where insurers ‘draw the line’ regarding ‘acceptable’. I get that it’s very difficult and therefore the wording is deliberately vague / generic. I am just surprised how few explicitly named exceptions there are to automatically included cover, but if the universal, never excepted rule is that everything is covered unless it’s specifically excluded then I’m fine. But it’s not that is it?
In the unlikely event that my home batteries experience a thermal event, I just have a nagging doubt that my insurer will say that I should have declared them and therefore I’m not covered.
As a consumer you have no obligation to second guess what things you might need to declare to an insurance company - if the insurer wants to know something the duty is on them to ask you about it when you take out the policy. Which can mean asking a specific question, or can mean asking you to tick a box saying that a list of assumptions is correct, but if they don't do either then they would have no grounds to complain that you didn't tell them about your solar battery.
I have an interest in this thread having recently had panels and batteries installed. Problem is I can't remember whether the insurer asked about solar panels and batteries on the proposal as I didn't have them then. I think I may contact them anyway just to inform them. There's also the issue of an extra £12K of rebuild costs to think about.2 -
I'm not aware of any repudiations based on non-declaration of batteries, and have been involved in several claims where home batteries and/or PV panels have been the direct cause of the incident.
I don't even think I've seen them mentioned specifically in a policy wording yet.
Our other debates on this thread have been more about general principles and how 'gaps' in wording might be dealt with.1 -
Building insurance policy questionnaires often have a very loosely worded item about any changes made to the building. Solar panels would certainly fall into that category. Personally, I would contact the insurer for my own peace of mind. If they say it's all OK you're fine. If they say they needed to be informed and the premium will increase you are at least covered should there be a problem.
0 -
TELLIT01 said:Building insurance policy questionnaires often have a very loosely worded item about any changes made to the building. Solar panels would certainly fall into that category.
It would be a strange question to ask about houses because nearly everyone would have to say yes. Any house more than a decade or two old probably has a new kitchen, bathroom and boiler at a minimum. Victorian houses will be mostly unrecognisable from their original setup and it would be impossible for the owner to list every alteration which has been fine over the years.0 -
Aretnap said:TELLIT01 said:Building insurance policy questionnaires often have a very loosely worded item about any changes made to the building. Solar panels would certainly fall into that category.
It would be a strange question to ask about houses because nearly everyone would have to say yes. Any house more than a decade or two old probably has a new kitchen, bathroom and boiler at a minimum. Victorian houses will be mostly unrecognisable from their original setup and it would be impossible for the owner to list every alteration which has been fine over the years.0 -
DullGreyGuy said:Aretnap said:TELLIT01 said:Building insurance policy questionnaires often have a very loosely worded item about any changes made to the building. Solar panels would certainly fall into that category.
It would be a strange question to ask about houses because nearly everyone would have to say yes. Any house more than a decade or two old probably has a new kitchen, bathroom and boiler at a minimum. Victorian houses will be mostly unrecognisable from their original setup and it would be impossible for the owner to list every alteration which has been fine over the years.1 -
CSI_Yorkshire said:DullGreyGuy said:Aretnap said:TELLIT01 said:Building insurance policy questionnaires often have a very loosely worded item about any changes made to the building. Solar panels would certainly fall into that category.
It would be a strange question to ask about houses because nearly everyone would have to say yes. Any house more than a decade or two old probably has a new kitchen, bathroom and boiler at a minimum. Victorian houses will be mostly unrecognisable from their original setup and it would be impossible for the owner to list every alteration which has been fine over the years.1 -
DullGreyGuy said:Aretnap said:TELLIT01 said:Building insurance policy questionnaires often have a very loosely worded item about any changes made to the building. Solar panels would certainly fall into that category.
It would be a strange question to ask about houses because nearly everyone would have to say yes. Any house more than a decade or two old probably has a new kitchen, bathroom and boiler at a minimum. Victorian houses will be mostly unrecognisable from their original setup and it would be impossible for the owner to list every alteration which has been fine over the years.0 -
wiscombe64 said:DullGreyGuy said:Aretnap said:TELLIT01 said:Building insurance policy questionnaires often have a very loosely worded item about any changes made to the building. Solar panels would certainly fall into that category.
It would be a strange question to ask about houses because nearly everyone would have to say yes. Any house more than a decade or two old probably has a new kitchen, bathroom and boiler at a minimum. Victorian houses will be mostly unrecognisable from their original setup and it would be impossible for the owner to list every alteration which has been fine over the years.
Just looking at the renewal notice from M&S/Aviva it is even less, it just says to check that the policy still meets you needs and that other insurers may offer different levels of cover and prices.0 -
Supplementary question. Are solar panels and home batteries covered by buildings insurance or contents insurance? My vote would be buildings insurance as they are an intrinsic part of the building’s electrical system. Any dissenters?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards