PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

SNP plan to outlaw sale of houses with gas boilers

13»

Comments

  • ProDave
    ProDave Posts: 3,785 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    user1977 said:
    ProDave said:

    Well it now seems the SNP's plan it the owner must pay for all the work, if they are to be able to sell their house, and there is only talk of very small grants that might cover a tiny percentage of the work needed.
    There's "only talk" of the policy coming into force at all, I'm not sure why people are assuming it would be enacted in a completely impractical way.

    I'm not even sure whether it's feasible for e.g. many listed buildings to be improved sufficiently to make the grade.
    Valid point.  It is just possible that some completely outrageous fictitious policy has been leaked to the press to gauge the amount of sheer horror at the proposals in order to determine how for to go when they publish the real proposals.  But I would not trust any party that can even think about something like this even if just put out there as a feeler for public opinion.

    Or a case of propose something really harsh, then people are more likely to accept the slightly harsh real policy later on and think "phew not as bad as I feared"

    If so that is no way to play politics. 
  • MeteredOut
    MeteredOut Posts: 3,148 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    I've not even read the article but can 100% guarantee its click-bait, probably some passing report by a think-tank that as per standard process, has to be reviewed by policy makers.

    There's no way this will happen in the next 10 years. It'd be political suicide for the SNP.
  • I've not even read the article but can 100% guarantee its click-bait, probably some passing report by a think-tank that as per standard process, has to be reviewed by policy makers.

    There's no way this will happen in the next 10 years. It'd be political suicide for the SNP.
    It is not their proposal though so it can be blamed on the Greens when it all goes pear-shaped.

    See the recent DRS scheme for an example.

    Things that are differerent: draw & drawer, brought & bought, loose & lose, dose & does, payed & paid


  • ComicGeek
    ComicGeek Posts: 1,657 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I've not even read the article but can 100% guarantee its click-bait, probably some passing report by a think-tank that as per standard process, has to be reviewed by policy makers.

    There's no way this will happen in the next 10 years. It'd be political suicide for the SNP.
    And absolutely no way linked to the Tory government announcements in the last couple of days promoting their 'practical' adjustments to climate change policies to not put additional costs on house owners - in strong contrast to the supposed SNP 'policy'.

    Isn't it great that the government cares about us all etc etc
  • Given its the SNP there will probably be a lot of help available to most people to upgrade.

    The only people who will end up paying out will be landlords and the very well off.
  • _Penny_Dreadful
    _Penny_Dreadful Posts: 1,472 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    The Scottish government is currently run by a SNP/Green coalition.  This sounds like a potential Green party policy which is only at this point in time being considered and despite the provative headline doesn't necessarily mean that homes with gas boilers won't meet the EPC C requirement because no one knows what that might look like.

    The Westminster government has already introduced a ban on new buildings being installed with gas boilers from 2025 with a proposed ban on the sale of gas boilers by 2035, although they might do a u-turn on that.  Whilst I agree that we do need to move away from our dependency on fossil fuel, and I say that as someone who works in oil & gas, most governments don't seem to have an effing clue about how to transition to renewable energy.
  • Mabel2012
    Mabel2012 Posts: 285 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Last night's BBC programme on heat pumps showed a heat pump installation in a bungalow taking 6 days at a cost of £18,000. That included replacing the old radiators. The equipment was huge with pipes going over the garage and into the loft. I was left feeling that a heat pump would not fit in many London flats, even if the price was right. I have a gas combi central heating system and use a Hive thermostat to control the timings and temperature. I didn't get the impression the heat pump system was controllable.

    Will we turn into Cubans, patching our old cars and boilers so they last forever.
  • ProDave
    ProDave Posts: 3,785 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I have said before, heat pumps work very well indeed in new houses with good insulation and particularly with under floor heating.  There really is no excuse why all new builds could not be built that way and heated with a heat pump.

    As that BBC program showed, many, if not most of the UK's old housing stock will need a LOT of work to upgrade them for a heat pump.  This has not been thought through.  Who wants to pay £18,000 reduced perhaps to £13,000 by the BUS grant to change their entire heating system to suit a heat pump?  And the "benefit" to them, is the same heating bills as they had with their gas boiler.
  • Robbo66
    Robbo66 Posts: 490 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    the biggest problem with this is that older houses cannot be retro fitted with heat pumps and energy recovery system to make them work as efficiently as a gas boiler, designing and building a house from the ground up around this technology works well. 
  • The main problem is the difference in price between electricity and gas.

    If this factor of 3-4x is changed that's when it all starts to become economically viable and even retrofits have a payback timescale.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.