We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Treasury looking at a "Tell Sid" stocks & shares campaign

2

Comments

  • MattMattMattUK
    MattMattMattUK Posts: 11,705 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    John464 said:
    Thatcherism was hugely popular and brought her a stonking election victory.
    But people like Truss didn't seem to realise that Thatcherism was a one off
    There will never be another Thatcher
    Because once you have sold everything you can't sell it again
    Truss failed to realise that she was nothing like Thatcher either, Thatcher would have thrown Truss out of the Conservative party, Thatcher had charisma, it might have rubbed some people up the wrong way, but she certainly had presence in a room. Thatcher was very intelligent (regardless of if you agree with how she used that intelligence), Truss, evidently is not, and indeed the vast majority of people who have had the misfortune of working with her describe her as at best "not very bright".
  • InvesterJones
    InvesterJones Posts: 1,345 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    I'd be happier if they just made buying individual gilts easier..
  • wmb194
    wmb194 Posts: 5,350 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I'd be happier if they just made buying individual gilts easier..
    I never tried it but you used to be able to issue orders to buy and sell them via the Post Office - I presume it went to the DMO or its brokers - but that was ended decade plus ago. Obviously you'd only discover the price later but it sounded easy enough.
  • Eyeful
    Eyeful Posts: 1,087 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think  Mrs T aim, was to build a "large war chest" so she could give the voters large "tax cuts" in the hope of winning her the next election.

    She did not need to sell the "UK family jewel's" at fire sale prices, to make the average person aware of the advantages of ownings shares.

    If a "share owing democracy" had really been the aim, putting the spot light on "the best kept secret in the city" at the time (i.e. InvestmentTrusts) or even Unit Trusts, was the easy and cheap way of doing it.

  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 10,270 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Eyeful said:
    I think  Mrs T aim, was to build a "large war chest" so she could give the voters large "tax cuts" in the hope of winning her the next election.

    She did not need to sell the "UK family jewel's" at fire sale prices, to make the average person aware of the advantages of ownings shares.

    If a "share owing democracy" had really been the aim, putting the spot light on "the best kept secret in the city" at the time (i.e. InvestmentTrusts) or even Unit Trusts, was the easy and cheap way of doing it.

    "Recollections may vary"

    There was no "fire sale".
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Eyeful said:
    If a "share owing democracy" had really been the aim, putting the spot light on "the best kept secret in the city" at the time (i.e. InvestmentTrusts) or even Unit Trusts, was the easy and cheap way of doing it.

    Like a previous poster, I'm unclear on why taxpayers (who mostly don't have any money to invest in shares) should be paying the investment industry's advertising costs for them. 
    If there is such a thing as a share owning democracy, the policy which has done the most to achieve it is auto enrolment. 
  • John464
    John464 Posts: 359 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    If there is such a thing as a share owning democracy, the policy which has done the most to achieve it is auto enrolment. 
    Depends which way you look at it I suppose.
    You could say the policy which did most to achieve a share owning democracy was public ownership of our housing, public transport, power and water supplies etc when everyone had a share in them.
  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 10,270 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    John464 said:
    If there is such a thing as a share owning democracy, the policy which has done the most to achieve it is auto enrolment. 
    Depends which way you look at it I suppose.
    You could say the policy which did most to achieve a share owning democracy was public ownership of our housing, public transport, power and water supplies etc when everyone had a share in them.
    ...only if the definition of 'share owning democracy' is one in which the shareholders have to pour money constantly into the company and never see a return on their investment, and have no meaningful say on how the company should be run.
  • Exodi
    Exodi Posts: 4,230 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Cashback Cashier Chutzpah Haggler
    > Cost of living crisis, escalating costs of many essential goods, energy prices out of control, spiraling interest rates causing unaffordable mortgages and rents, debt charities reporting record high numbers

    > "Here's what you can do with all of your spare money".
    Know what you don't
  • Exodi
    Exodi Posts: 4,230 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Cashback Cashier Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 7 July 2023 at 7:49AM
    Andrew Griffith, the economic secretary to the Treasury:

    “Increasing individual share ownership is also about changing culture, attitudes to risk and supporting individual responsibility.”
    I really hope this is referring to individual people and not individual shares. Last thing we need is the public with what little money they have left YOLO'ing it on TSLA...

    I'm optimistic it is the former, but it just seems like such a random word to throw in when the sentence makes just as much sense without it.
    Know what you don't
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.